Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
5% will either be based on:-
a/JV Terms -therefore below FMV
b/Hybrid of JV terms - therefore below market value
c/Reasonably agreed terms - therefore near to FMV
a/b will be a buying opportunity
c will see a good rise.
Only c will reflect Havierons current value. GGP is also more than just Havieron.
Maybe just mumbo jumbo though.
I agree with Gerryjo,
If you were looking to 'secure a large holding' in a major discovery you would look to do it during the 'orphan period' when there is a general drop, after euphoria of discovery/drill results/and confirmations, in sp which can easily be manipulated to a larger drop affecting sentiment. Generally the downward curve following discovery, on the Lassonde curve seems excessive so I wonder if the above applies but is not listed as a reason for the drop on curve examples - stating other factors for the drop. At some point tough those manipulating the sp have to change tack, from shorting/suppression to investing, possibly at FS as Gerryjo has mentioned. This has a dramatic effect on sp as can be seen on the curve which again, IMO, is more dramatic than just the institutions coming in (as mentioned on the curve) than should be the case.
Just my thoughts, and maybe not that coherent sorry, on current sp action. Would be interested in constructive feedback.
Oh would love to see another large discovery confirmed to completely F.U. the curve:)
GLA
LP
Is that US or Canadian dollar?
Hi TD2,
I registered for news/RNS's on their website and they send me information direct to my email I've had them all so far.
Yes not good that they don't publish here in the same way.
Hope this helps.
TD2,
'There should have been an RNS first thing this morning but as usual the Canuks couldn't be arzed.'
Is 06:26 not early enough for you?
Hi 1plus1,
Thanks for your response.
I would not disagree with your calcs regarding WSBN's MCAP its all speculative really, could go to £10m could go to £50m just on sentiment and expectation prior to results. I'm happy with the risk/reward here.
I do not think that you are knocking GGP, I hope I haven't given that impression, I was just querying some of your calcs.
With respect I would not agree though that the 5% price alone will define GGP's current market value as the terms, cut off point etc. will need to be considered to establish exactly how the agreed sum relates to current value. Also there are other assets to consider as WSBN is considered I suppose. Maybe when you say that the 5% will make clear GGP's market value you had included the above? but your comment suggest that it will just be a case of multiplying up the 5% to arrive at a current market value. I do not think that would provide an accurate assessment. However you may be proved right depending on whether the market/PI's take your point of view or mine. Interesting to see which way it goes.
Anyway good luck with WSBN and all your investments.
1plus 1, thanks for your reply,
I thought that may have been the way you calculated it.
Your calcs though seem to disregard the value, to ggp, of the 5% newcrest will have to acquire. Also if you are basing figures on the MRE's does that mean that WSBN is worth £0 at the moment? surely all mine values are based somewhat on future prospects?
Anyway I'm in GGP and WSBN, for the long term, so hope both do very well.
GLA.
Hi 1plus1,
I'm a bit confused as to how the NPV reduces if the MRE has increased from 2m to 6m ounces? re your comment:-
2) “The realisable value of the asset is still very uncertain” - Greatland’s most recent published NPV figure is $508m (not all attributable to them) at US$1750 gold (probably a reasonable long term estimate) (based on an initial 2 Moz AuEq, of which Greatland owns 30%). Greatland have since upgraded their mineral reserve est to 6.5 Moz, so very roughly, if 100% of that reserve was developed, assuming the same head grade (unlikely - I suspect it will be lower based on drill results), this would equate to an NPV attributable to GGP of roughly US$495m or GBP 401.
joteller
Posts: 204Price: 88.72No Opinion????
'76 price target is a good aim in the short term, with a return to better times in 2024'
Shorting much???? :)
Ah ok thanks FWS78, apologies to sharefall.
Sharefall 'They have no prior record in nuclear tech '??
RNS 20th Dec 2021 ''Rolls-Royce has been a nuclear reactor plant designer since the start of the UK nuclear submarine programme in the 1950s.
Rolls-Royce SMR will draw upon standard nuclear energy technology that has been used in 400 reactors around the world. ''
Signed
ogi ogi ogi, was used by the street vendor as he walked through the streets in Wales selling his Pies, a bit like his jingle or chime by todays vendors... oi oi oi was the response made by someone to catch his attention, willing to purchase the pies from the vendor. :)
Ah I see, thought you were talking bout last tourny win, my bad :)
1996??? think 1966 :) Welsh so can't let that go :):)
Hi Zoros,
Re: We have advertised that 1.6Mt of pure gold has been confirmed in 28% of 6% of the SE crescent WITHOUT even considering the rest of the UK.
Is this not 1.6Moz's?
Great video Dip thanks.
Not just a chartist goes through the fundamentals too, good watch for any new investors or those thinking of diving in.
VH so transparent you could be a window, certainly a pane anyway. byeeeeeeeee
Timeserved, filtered suggest all do the same as sadly just trying to get a rise from good people, pointless input. Bye Bye TS. :)
just added 56448 @ 17.694. 11.45am