We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
I agree that we are unlikely to see much a return for our Factom investment. But surely Ed HAS to release an RNS to update us on the deal and what, if any, payments we could/may receive. Even if it's to say we won't receive anything; fine, but let us know!
Still nothing about Factom. Surely this needs to be an RNS? Even if it's to say that the value of the sale is not deemed to be material to Seed? Currently I'm hoping we will recoup something from the sale, but the silence is deafening
Morning all,
Is anyone able to explain the Factom findings in the comment below and the new company? Does it mean Factom is going concern again?
Sorry to ask!!
Good interview! I have c.400k shares. I’m looking to take a £1.5k each out of a couple of different stocks as a deposit for something. Anyway, I can only seem to sell £400 here? It won’t quote me anything above, any idea why?
Not a bad place to be!
Agree with these posts, if you’ve not listened to it already or want an introduction to FFWD it’s a nice, easy, and interesting listen.
When will this be valued appropriately? It currently has a MC of £21m, but has £6.5m cash (31% of MC). Leap Gaming hasn’t been properly valued for a while, and whether it is bought out by IMG Arena or not; an up to date valuation should have a marked impact on our NAV. I’m new here, but have been reading and researching over the last few days. Glad I got in whilst it’s under the radar.
Evening all,
Quick question if I may. I get that FFWD own 43% of Leap, but I don't understand how this is connected to Endeavor's IPO. I get that they also own a stake in Leap - but why does Endeavour having an IPO mean an increase in the value of Leap (and thus for FFWD)?
Sorry if I'm being a bit dim - it's an honest question :)
Lewis
Liam,
The amount of comments you offer is somewhat disconcerting. Not only do you have a negative bias, but you seem to spend all day everyday on here, since you "joined" LSE. The problem, for you, is you have made this agenda and bias so intrinsically transparent in your posts that I'm not sure they have the impact you may wish on the audience.
I'm going to hypothesise; you're a late-middle aged man, probably educated but never reached the job role you deem you deserve, I imagine you've been investing for some years and had FUM up to around the start of August but sold out before the rise. I imagine this has given you a chip on your shoulder which you can't itch other than berate the stock to some how prove your poor timed transactional decisions correct. I'm afraid that won't happen. Good luck in your next investment.
Just to be clear. Is this a placebo or not? I thought when it was referred to as that in The Time's article some of the LTHs mentioned older RNS that showed there were active ingredients. Not just "alcohol and water". Does anyone, excluding Liambooth, who clearly has an agenda, have any details to hand?
I can't believe that, it were a placebo, it would have garnered this much interest as well as the Doctor from John Hopkins involvement that we read about in the recent RNS.
It would be nice if we could put this rumour to bed?
Best wishes,
Lewis
“ 18 Mar 2021
Morocco moves closer to unlocking domestic gas riches, but funding still hangs in the balance, says GlobalData”
https://www.globaldata.com/morocco-moves-closer-unlocking-domestic-gas-riches-funding-still-hangs-balance-says-globaldata/
I re-watched both the recent CFO interviews this morning. I noticed he referenced 'new ventures' (plural) often. At one point however, near the end, when asked about news flow he says "we'll have the announcement of the new venture itself". I read this as there is considerable and specific work underway already on one new venture, which may be progressing further that we envisaged. I look forward to finding out what this is - maybe that could be our next RNS!