Member Info for LeOracle

Debating Share-Trader on here is pointless. You're either debating a politician or ChatGPT, both equally incapable of committing to a concrete stance. All their posts follow a formula:

1. Acknowledge opposing view politely

2. Reframe to vague risk/reward

3. Bang on about sentiment and asymmetry

4. Wrap up with a "only time will tell"

So it's either AI-assisted drivel or beige corporate-style commentary, with no mention of warrant overhang or fundamentals. Polished as it is, because there’s never anything falsifiable brought up, there isn’t really a position to debate.

*Tail

Apologies, it's been a long day!

Cando, if this goes up by 200 to 300 percent, it would simply fuel further dilution, due to the outstanding warrants.

But if it were to rise by such an amount, due to some more bad faith advertisements, and it wasn't immediately brought back down to the conversion price, it would still be under 7.5p a share! Miles below most people on here's average. I doubt that would send anyone here scurring away with their tale between their legs.

In all fairness to Goose, the 3 million he claimed to have invested was in CPAI, not MAST. So he's only down 50% on that. Talk to me Goose! Why do you keep buying AIM stocks at their peak which then burn up in the atmosphere?

On a whim, and following your posts late last month, I bought a test position: 35 shares of MAST at 7.7p.

Those shares are now down ~40.6%, a loss of about £1.10 (roughly one-third of a meal deal). I’m not posting this as a pity party, as the amount is trivial, but as a real-world illustration.

Anyone who has followed your advice over the past three months and bought is currently underwater. This isn't me deramping, or being a paid short, it's just arithmetic.

You’ve repeatedly claimed that the "Petes" (the fact you appear not to realise there are two different Petes is starting to feel like a Monty Python sketch, but that’s beside the point) are harming people with their posts. In reality, anyone who listened to caution and stayed out is perfectly fine. Warning people to be wary of an investment doesn’t destroy pensions, savings, or lives, as holding cash has never bankrupted anyone.

By contrast, encouraging repeated buying while ignoring dilution, warrant overhang, and funding mechanics has had a measurable outcome: losses for those who acted on it.

Before you suggest I’m part of some cohort or agenda, this isn’t personal. Just an update on how your advice has played out in practice.

Is that a list of people who actually have a brain? And for your information, I own 34 shares of MAST, which I bought on a whim last week. They cost me about £2.60, 95% cheaper than when you were first ramping them.

Maybe we should reach out to Vanguard and have them set up an "Inverse JamesTrader71" EFT? It'd be up 60% this year alone!

As long as the cheerleaders keep coaxing retail into funding the warrant conversions, the board needs people like Pete. History always repeats - EUA, ARBK, SNG, take your pick. Warrants dilute the SP, retail “buys the dip,” and that liquidity gets eaten up by whoever’s unloading. Then, just like we're seeing now, it gets pinned on short sellers instead of the real culprit: relentless warrant conversion. Every rally this has is somebody's exit liquidity, I hope no one confuses it with the a sign strength. Pete, Sav, and the rest have likely saved people thousands.

Victims? Anybody who took his advice and either sold or held off buying is in the green, at least compared to what they would currently be right now. The share price is hovering around 6p continues to fall.

The company urgently needed cash and chose to issue warrants at 4p while the retail crowd was driving the price up. That’s not behaviour that protects shareholders. If anything, MAST are the predatory figure here, not Pete. Calling a turd a turd is not trolling.

I take some joy in being 'that guy', Pete, as your posts do a world of good; everyone here needs a splash of cold water.

But it would be remiss of me not to highlight the grammatical errors in your last post

ORIGINAL:

"Did you both go to the same school that had an extremely poor English teacher."

CORRECTED:

"Did you both go to the same school that had an extremely poor English teacher?"

ORIGINAL:

"Like JT71, I guess you didn’t pay much attention to in economics either!!!"

CORRECTED:

"Like JT71, I guess you didn’t pay much attention in economics either!"