RE: Lorna Blaisse11 Jan 2024 12:48
Skippys - your posts are just descending into completely weak and non sensical argument, trying to find positives where there are none. The issue is not whether the company remains a going concern on a duster at Itumbula. It's about the new reality it will create, as follows:
1) Share price will tank as (another) duster is announced.
2) Share price will struggle to recover because the market knows they have used up all their cash.
3) They will then really struggle to raise sufficient funds to re-enter Tai 3, and as I said yesterday, might decide not to bother because the basement fault theory will have been undermined by the Itumbula duster.
4) The other projects are going to be even more costly, because they have no drill ready targets on them. So they need to spend £millions to get them drill ready, and then more millions to drill. It's simply not happening.
For shareholders, this is a bad enough scenario as it is, without trying to draw any false comfort from the fact that the company might continue as a going concern. The only concern is the share price. It will be decimated by any duster and then also by the dilution that will follow, which will most likely only be to pay for lifestyle wages (not exploration).
If you want to talk up a discovery that is fine (and logical), but don't try to spin any positives from a duster because there are NONE. All imo and dyor