RE: Technical question31 Dec 2023 14:29
I can't see how this investment can be about the COS. Firstly, there is no CPR re Itumbula, and no other COS figure from anywhere else. Secondly, He1 has only recently come up with a new theory (basement fault theory), which it wants to test. There is no independent critique of this theory. Thirdly, when it comes to geology, He1 has hardly got anything correct to date? Fourthly, the COS for Tai, which had all this data, was only 16%. It turned out that even 16% was too high, because NONE of the targets that were drilled were successful. They were dusters. Fifthly, He1 have always stated that Tai was their highest probability target. That's why it was drilled first and second.
Against this backdrop, how can anyone make a persuasive argument that they are investing into He1 because of COS at Itumbula? For any sane and sensible individual, the COS factor would actually make you avoid this share, either because there is no reliable information about it, or if you are making an educated guess about COS at Itumbula, you are going to struggle to sensibly, or justifiably, come up with a %COS that is much higher than what the CPR gave you for Tai? All imo