RE: Tree Shake29 May 2024 12:21
Well, they have said they are in "negotiation", which suggests that all key terms are NOT agreed. CMET said in a recent interview that they were willing to give away the upside, to get the deal done. That suggests that CMET are needy and Sheffield are driving the deal.
Also, CMET can't afford anything other than a deal that leaves them "fully funded" to production. That is what is supposed to happen. Anything less than this, and the concern might be that Sheffield are effectively cornering CMET to be taken out on the cheap later down the line if the resource/project lives up to expectations following the drilling and PFS.
I hope it's not one of those deals whereby if either party can't afford its share of future costs under the JV, that party's interest in the project gets diluted.
As I say, it has to be a deal that leaves CMET fully funded to production imho to avoid all these risks. That's what has been promised.