The BoD cannot win11 Apr 2024 11:28
Lots of regurgitation of "blame" factors here and dissatisfaction and "The Board had better sort it out!" posts.
It is undeniable that the Board has overseen a PR disaster with the sp but it is the foresight/hindsight argument as ever.
Rewind to just ahead of the RF deal. We were all questioning and speculating where the cash for any progress would come from. Sareum are cash-strapped and have no revenue and no successful trials behind them. Puma has stated that they approached the City who were offering 30p per share. At the time, RF agreed a £1.03 per share deal. So did the Board act in our interest by potentially reducing dilution - I think they did.
RF then royally screw us all - Was the Board guilty of naivety? - Probably but we are not privy to conversations just the outcomes.
This Chatboard was awash with criticism and vitriol and speculation that this had all been set up etc: etc: rightfully, demands BoD action. This comes in the form of reassurance of no new drawdowns with RF, Director buys, HNWI buy, a placing to compensate for RF funds not being drawn and a wrap initially for £300k for pi's that was extended once it was realised that more could be raised.
So the Board acted very quickly and in accordance with our wishes. The sp fell to 10.3p and there was plenty of opportunity to buy at that level on the open market if pi's found themselves unable to participate in the offer.
RF are almost out save for warrants and £800k to be settled by August 2025.
With the benefit of hindsight and lots of time to pick holes in all of the above, yet more complaint, outrage and indignation ensues coupled with expressions of "or else"
I recognise that things have gone wrong courtesy of RF and some Brokers but try placing yourselves in that Boardroom and being part of the scenario. The Board can be forgiven that, due to the amount of pi vitriol being expressed here, that they would not get the necessary funds to progress due to pi dissatisfaction and they needed certainty. The City provided certainty. With hindsight, maybe they could have raised more as the appetite certainly seems to be there amongst us loyal shareholders. But they didn't know that at the time did they?
IMO Sareum are through the worst of this and we move into news periods and a recovery of the sp. I appreciate that, to some, I come across as an apologist for the Board. I am not, but I do think that both sides of the coin should be looked at and, more importantly, understood.
None of us like what has happened here but - lets face it - we have all been given equal opportunity to fill our boots at these low levels if the appetite was genuinely there.
Anyway, enough from me.