Member Info for Lawrence13

ball****

Poppy**** ...just sell our 29.9% holding for 10 million dollars and be done with it.

Maybe you can ring them

What the theory that Strukov wants to own POG? Of course it doesn't I'm pleased that POG has made a modest recovery only another93% and well be back where we were this time last year. \I think the blatant attempt to sell IRC share holding for 29.9% became untenable , too obvious plus the fact that reality is dynamic and all sorts can happen. I see USG propose to keep IRC now. . If this recovery is genuine then Strukov doesn't want the SP going up past the price he paid for the shares from bonum. If we get back to over 30p then he's stuffed and may just decide to get the best out of his 29% holding

Well I know we always say the next set of results are the most important but I feel with these its going to be the first real indicator of where POG is heading. If they are poor with no excuses then I would say driving the company down in readiness for a take over bid is in the offing. But as far as I can grasp things, Strukov would still have to pay the shareholder what he paid for the Bonum shares. I've heard he paid a premium for those but if that is the case I'm not sure that value is official or not Of course if it still qualifies then at least we'll have a parachute out with a higher share price than at present. Again if all of that is correct then no matter how low the share price can be manipulated down it doesn't matter as the bonum price will still have to be paid to the shareholder. So in a way Strukov is snookered

I'm not aware of the rules of a take over other than once 30% is reached a mandatory offer has to be made , so by that I would imagine USG (strukov) can officially own anymore. But say a take over offer is launched do all share holders vote and that majoity decision is binding on everyone? Can someone enlighten me.

Now of course if the interim results are good then hopefully the SP will rise and that may dispel cocerns about Strukov for people like me, However saying that there is still the matter of our 29.9% IRC stake which has all gone very quiet indeed. If that still goes ahead despite a good interim result it will leave a very bad taste.

Finally Pavel has been told he is to be incarcerated now until the end of November and he can be detained without trial for up to 18 months. I hear his lawyers have sworn testimony from the real estate agent who sold the property in question; that the price was realistic,
It seems reasonable to me that there is really no case against Pavel as if there was it would have gone to trial by now., so we have a detaining exercise to keep him out of the way. Who knows, but I do keep hearing these funny voices.

So you're down already.

The Trend?

It's either top up or top yourself.

obviously pavel took all the money and still is.

20p would be an achievement

Tra1

Don't dive up the day job.

Ive had it confirmed. If strukov does make a bid he has to pay his highest price he's paid in the last twelve months and that is what he paid to Bonum, Word is he paid a premium price for those if so that is the price he has to pay every shareholder. If around 30 odd pence I'd take it . Strukov though , sadly will make an absolute fortune once gold soars ahead. Easily £5 per share

Strukov is ready to pounce and he has been f&*king clever about it. The share's he needed to get 29/30% he obtained from bonum at an unknown price but rumour is far higher than the market price, Now under the Take over panels rules Strukov will have to offer all share holders the highest price he's paid for pog shares in the last 12 months prior to the take over bid. Now as far as I can glean that would be june/july this year at I believe around 24/25p. So at best we would all be offered 25p. per share (hope I'm right) but a ittle bird tells me that transaction with Bonum was substantially higher. Now the fly in that ointment for me is does that transaction count. For example can I sell my shares to someone privately outside of the LSE or do all share transactions have to be officially logged? If so then Strukov has to over the share holders the price he paid for the Bonum acquisition. As for him raising the money . he probably owns stocken

The two P's took the share price from 4 to 5p because they were too ambitious for the share holder as well as themselves. They also lost out of it but their prize if it had come off would have made share holders very rich indeed. But all that pain has gone and the POX hubs are now here and this lot still **** up. I would also say the difference withthe two P's in a Pog and Strukov s the P's wanted everyone to participate in their gamble whereas Strukov just wants the inevitable surge of POGs fortunes to enrich him

"freddie13"

Not you as well.

And I will add that their owned mine production fell 158.3koz in H1 2021 from (H1 2020: 213.7koz),

"Lawrence13 the reason why gold production fell 39% has been well stated n the accounts, the fact they did not have enough third party concentrate"

Precisely and what about their own concentrate

were crooks, when only a few got voted of , Now if these crimes are so obvious by those sent packing; why has Pavel been banged up 8 months still without charge? You would have thought with all that supposed evidence against him he would have been charged, found guilty and serving a long official sentence. The reason is that don't have enough to charge him but desperately need him out of the way.

Part of me keeps saying that gold has to soar due to all the fictitious paper money that keeps being created but then despite all these factors like money supply, peak gold. basel III and what the experts predict gold does the opposite. Back to POG : can you expalin why standard gold production fell 39% H1 2021?

" struk thought it was a good investment and he knew the results were after being milked heavily by the top management."

And now St Konstantine has cleared out the money grabbers from Temple Pog things are a whole lot better, yeah right.