RE: Feedback from Enq regarding Barclay4 Apr 2019 18:14
Hi Pelle,
ENQ IR needs to be more direct to get back the trust of some of the good (not all) analysts:
-E.g., " With regards the debt, we made our amortisation payment due on Monday and so have now reduced the bank facility (excluding the revolving facility of $75m) from $1,125 million to $680 million since mid-2018, and so are making good progress with reducing our debt as planned." True, but true net debt decrease is less than that, as
It borrowed $175M from Oz capital to repay $175M of the RCF, and increased "Payables" by $50M.
- "Kraken performance, which has been improving since our year end results" Get some production figures out as performance improves in a meaningful way.
- "They have downgraded because they have moved the Kraken reserves to the lower estimate announced by Cairn, which we clearly disagree with and said so in a public RNS at the time Cairn made their announcement." For ENQ to disagree it needs to be sure that all that oil can be extracted profitably. The market thinks otherwise. Rather than repeating themselves they should put out a revised production plan for the rest of the life of the field etc. to show why they are correct. The same oil might be there, but with the production profile over the years ahead being completely different, it might not be economically to extract it all. Remember FDP was done under the assumption POO would be $90. And, that is not what it is at the moment.
ENQ is its worst enemy by not being more proactive in releasing objective news.
To the LTHs, just relax and enjoy the SP volatility.
BTW, does anyone know if Magnus is producing above 20K bopd?