Member Info for krautyankee

Cavemandave - LOL !!

correct. fundamentals have exactly NOTHING to do with how the listed miners are currently being valued. BTC price and, to a certain extent hash rate. Margin % / efficiency do not currently play a role. BTW - none of the other listed miners, as far as I know, give the market a monthly operational update.....

the exact text was "in the coming days". Feel free to interpret as needed.

sure wish we had the 85 PH we had to take off line in October....let's hope the other T 17s are performing to specs.

re. HIVE: The only thing they have in common is that both companies are each buying a part of gpu.one; HIVE is taking on the gpu.one employees as well. Argo will get the Mirabel & Baie Comeau sites. Of course, there was that very messy "understanding" that was announced back in 2019; that fire got put out very quickly by First Investments holding. With everyone making hay at the moment, I do not see a reason to merge. Of course, all offers have to be put to a vote, but IMO unlikely in the current environment. I think there could be something brewing with core scientific, since Argo are desperately trying to add more hashrate ASAP. DYOR.

"nothing to see here,...move on"

Yes, I remember that as well. There was speculation that it was a former ceo / director. I wonder how that person is feeling now, when he checks the stock price...?

PW has skin in the game; check the RNS (sometime in the summer: june or july). Many of us "old-timers" encouraged him, and rest of BoD, to purchase some shares a few months prior. check posts here, from april/may. PW has done well with these shares: 300 or 400k purchased, when SP was less than 5 pence.....

biotech; pls explain your comment re. Argo's algorhythm "advantage".

people seem to have forgotten, that there is still a deal in the cards (LOI signed) that would allow argo to purchase the gpu.one facility.

trade for 38 cents (frankfurt) just went through....close to double the closing price on the 24th.

wms - using the marketwatch site. symbol is 0XP in frankfurt. Also, like you, have posted a few times in stocktwits.

opened at 33 cents in frankfurt; now at 29. not much liquidity though, so should not necessarily be taken as a a reliable indicator. still, should be huge buying pressure tomorrow in london unless btc price caves.

Greetings Blonity; Enjoyed and appreciated your analysis. One thing I would like to see, when assessing the miners is: Some balance sheet metrics. Some of the miners in the group have considerable debt, I think. enjoy the holidays.

flashgem - why are you reposting old news and excerpts from old RNSs? No one that is already invested needs to be convinced. The cheerleading squad is not currently hosting tryouts.

Not impressed with Oct. results; they barely managed to almost match the Sept. BTC total, but had 1 extra day to mine and also did not experience "4 lost days" of Hashrate. The BTC price is out of their control, so the margin increase was not due to any company improvements. The "by the way" mentions in their RNS (Oct.: bad performance of some of their rigs; Sept.: Contract dispute caused 4 days of downtime) lead me to believe that their operations are not as tight as they should be. Let's see how the difficulty adjustment impacts their Nov. performance.

Banana - you are dreaming, my friend. The last mining day was Saturday. Sunday is not a workday in Canada or the UK. The October numbers will be out by the end of the week, not before.

PW has still not explained exactly what happened (4 days of downtime). Also, considering that PW was operations VP before becoming CEO, this "problem", and how it was allowed to happen, is an even bigger mystery. I think the simultaneous announcement that ARB will buy the GPU.one data centre is a novice distraction technique. I hope I am wrong and will give Kudos if PW manages to turn this issue into a big positive for the company.

Oil - that was exactly my point; normally, there are disclosure rules that restrictthis type of thing. shareholders are not entitled to any more information than a normal PI. Even if the so-called meeting was mainly "chat and banter", any one of the people present could interprete what PW "conveyed" differently, and then post the information here. I do not know the exact, legal definition of "material information", but normally a CEO is extremely restricted as to what & when and to whom he can share information. I want information as much as the next guy, but any actions that could result in a lawsuit or "scandal" should obviously be avoided.

Although happy and even excited about any news, I find it VERY unprofessional that there is information being shared by the CEO, via "private" calls, emails, whatever. IMO This needs to stop. Either there is an official way to distribute information & news, so that everyone is informed and also to eliminate any ensueing "embellishment" (intentional, or not) or there should be nothing communicated.