Member Info for Korriban

There is nothing wrong with questions regarding funding in future. I hold long term but I fully understand many will have concerns about future funding. That's why if it's not an issue the ones making the biggest gains already hold prior to this being finalised.

From what I gathered from investor meet the grades of CU are not as good as we should expect hence OM taking an age to collect the first truck. Probably had to sift through everything that was mined & put X amount of copper at the required % to the one side. 8 months to production but the CU at 3.7%- 5% is 30m down so how many more months drilling to you get down to this level mine it & then sell it?

"Part of the reason for the rise is that the proxy form released last night confirms that they are asking for permission to issue shares to clear some of the debt at 2p which was double the lows yesterday".

Why not clear all of the debt?

isn't the debt the biggest noose?

if we need to raise & it's going to be a big raise why not just bite he bullet & get all debt cleared?

I am led to believe the biggest cost to CRTM currently is the debt & it's interest. The priority therefore must be to clear the balance sheet & loosen the noose from around the companies neck. There is a slim & narrow road to SP recover but getting rid of this debt & interest repayments is priority. All things considered there has to be a big raise / dilution to clear the debt & leave enough working capital to move forward with Molulu. I would also like to think the 5 mines 5 jurisdictions has been kicked into touch as it is now just the stuff if fairy tales.

I'll eat my hat if ore sales commence 2025.

Much like CGO who had a buyer in waiting but never sold anything. Until rns stating otherwise that's how investors see CRTM. All investors see is lies & whilst I remain neutral I can see why they feel & think that way. Not a good look. Many believe Russell will sneak out the back door selling his lot to NIU with an rns of I had no option or forced or personal reasons. I remain hopeful that is not the case but given all the missed deadlines nothing surprises me now. Loosing faith but continue to hold.

There are positives like the ore bodies discovered but there are also negatives. That's the CRTM way with rns(s) less frequent as that creates liquidity for traders & RF does not want traders so longer periods between rns mean less liquidity for traders but also rns(s) with both positive & negative information in them. People focus on those 0.5p fellas & I'd say quite rightly especially after the repricing of 5 & 10p warrants to 0.5p but one should also consider the ore bodies discovered. I think it's safe to say after the last rns it's adds roughly another 120m shares (remember RF) wanted circa 100m shares in issue & dilution to a minimum (that is out the window). I so not see the company execution of 5 mines 5 jurisdictions imagine the dilution after this? Be diluted to oblivion! Also although it took a while to grasp the rns it's appears that NIU practically own CRTM now so do they want 5 mines 5 jurisdictions? Let's just prove Molulu up & sell it thus trying to make back some of the money lost or paper losses. Who knows might even make a small profit. But clns & 0.5p fellas are a worry. Investment case still there but not without risk. Again depends on entry point averages etc.

There are positives like the ore bodies discovered but there are also negatives. That's the CRTM way with rns(s) less frequent as that creates liquidity for traders & RF does not want traders so longer periods between rns mean less liquidity for traders but also rns(s) with both positive & negative information in them. People focus on those 0.5p fellas & I'd say quite rightly especially after the repricing of 5 & 10p warrants to 0.5p but one should also consider the ore bodies discovered. I think it's safe to say after the last rns it's adds roughly another 120m shares (remember RF) wanted circa 100m shares in issue & dilution to a minimum (th

There are positives like the ore b

There is nothing investors can do bar sell, buy or hold. FCA have already had a look re the sells & were obviously satisfied with the reason and as such the co did not have to dentist pending investigation & then re list once that process was completed.

All just hearsay.

That is all I am seeing posted on the BB.

It is like an episode of desperate housewives.

Apologies phone keeps posting message before I have finished completing the text - post button too close to keypad.

The is a BOD so if the company is missing deadlines this is a BOD issue at not one persons fault or responsibility & I am always mindful of that. So many focus on RF & how this is all his fault I'm not on that bandwagon cause he is the only one turning up monthly in month out travelling the world, meeting people, doing interviews & getting CRTM out there. I have yet to see any other BOD do this.

If you also listen to his interviews you will remember that RF is an ex hedge fund manager with an astute knowledge of markets & black swan events etc.

I'm not having it that someone that clued up on the markets suddenly doesn't know the company needs A, B or C so I'm starting to wonder who else may be at fault for delays be it another BOD, legal dept, workers on ground, offtakers or a combination of the above.

However this is just a chain of thought process & I could dig the rest of the year & still be no closer to an answer.

I'm calling BS on the rumour you have said may or may not be true & hopefully the next RNS provides updates on a few fronts & the co can move on positively for all involved

The is a BOD so if the company is missing deadlines this is a BOD issue at not one persons fault or responsibility & I am always mindful of that. So many focus on RF & how this is all his fault I'm not on that bandwagon cause he is the only one turning up monthly in month out travelling the world, meeting people, doing interviews & getting CRTM out there. I have yet to see any other BOD do this.

If you also listen to his interviews you will remember that RF is an ex hedge fund manager with an astute knowledge of markets & black swan events etc.

I'm not having it that someone that clued up on the markets suddenly doesn't know the company needs A, B or C so I'm starting to wonder who else may be at fault for delays be it another BOD, legal dept, workers on ground, offtakers or a combination of the above.

However this is just a chain of thought process & I could dig the rest of the year & still be no xlos

The is a BOD so if the company is missing deadlines this is a BOD issue at not one persons fault or responsibility & I am always mindful of that. So many focus on RF & how this is all his fault I'm not on that bandwagon cause he is the only one turning up monthly in month out travelling the world, meeting people, doing interviews & getting CRTM out there. I have yet to see any other BOD do this.

If you also listen to his interviews you will remember that RF is an ex h

News is due & the company is not a one person show so what are the BOD doing?

By that I do not mean RF I mean all of them!

RF is the only person I know to have been doing any work, travelling the world , meeting people & on the ground at Molulu.

Begs the Q what are other BOD doing & do some need replaced?

No news & this is creeping down to 2p.

It's just a tg group where both positive & negative views are allowed by owner but out right ****ging people off or accusing them of things with zero proof is not. exactly how a group should be run.

but there isn't a sole in there that doesn't agree that timelines have been as issue. However as always it is in the presentation of putting that point across that eludes some.

Replaces message before the send button is right beneath the key pad which is tiny on mobile.

it's just a tg group where both positive & negative views are allowed by owner but out right ****ging people off or accusing them of things with zero proof is not. exactly how a group should be run.

but there isn't a sole in there that doesn't agree that timelines have been as issue. however a

TG is merely a TG nothing more nothing less & people are free to sell & buy as they choose. I don't buy & sell because someone else has. Research determines if I buy or not that way I have conviction in what I am holding. This is key.

I'll await further news & see what transpires.

When investors say there is nothing of value on the LSE BB you are a prime example Mazza.

No more convo to be had I'll let you get back to clogging up this BB with lies, conspiracy theories & you're moaning.

"frankly, astonished that there aren't more conspiracy theories about how the last 18months have failingly progressed."

Cause that's what you specialise in conspiracy theories.