Member Info for Kooba

“In order to comply with the rules of the scheme, a number of the shares will be sold to meet tax and fee obligations. To meet the exercise of these options, the EBT purchased ordinary shares of 10p each in Nanoco on the open market of the London Stock Exchange.”

So it appears the company once the exercise of the deferred award was triggered bought 928580 in the market for the employee benefit trust to meet its obligation and then sold 433982 shares to meet the tax obligation of it being a taxable benefit to staff as is often the case. So it looks like there was a 494598 shares net purchased in the market in the past few days on top of the ongoing share buyback. Allowing this to a major capital event when the company is in the process of completing a capital distribution through on market buy back looks wrong..since it was transactions effected for the benefit of employees know the dates and prices of such transactions would be appropriate.

Yes odd they are selling in the market to cover tax expenses and costs at the same time as the company are being the primary buyer in the market..not sure why they are doing this now when there is little real rice discovery post the distribution..i can guess though.

Cluedo is over ..

And if anyone asked i would have told them straight.

Sweaty

You wouldn’t know a fact if it slapped you in the face.

Given far too much open and honest time to a bad actor who is becoming rather obsessed ..unfortunately i know the type.

Stop posting about me or i will defend myself against the ignorant lies you make up. Post on the company if you have an opinion.

If get back under your stone you find offensive and a personal attack i suggest social media is not for you.

Charty perhaps if you stopped making outrageous accusations and focused more on the company than me you might have something worthwhile to say …as it is you just appear a bit of a weird to me.

For goodness sake ..they have said it is STM that placed an order for 2 materials..it is unusual that they do not disclose the quantum of the order. They gave some previous guidance that it would be low $ millions and then dropped to the $100ks now they will not divulge and recognise anything tin the revenues released or forecast for current year. Is that not odd.

Confidentiality around jv ( not really) , end user yep but not around how much they sold and for what ..it was received , produced and shipped and invoiced within a few weeks. Why not be open and tell us the financials..it is a continuing obligation to keep shareholders in a listed company informed,,otherwise how can we tell how revenues might build as they say they will?

They did muck about with the European customer for a bit but after they had announced the jv and their marketing put STm in everything. It was also obvious sometime before the confirmation that it was STM from stuff STM put out.

So confidentiality when it suits is my view.

Do i comment exclusively on this company?

Maybe on here.

Do you give a real stalker vibe…yes you’ve obviously gone back over many posts..oh and Hamoodi called a GM not an AGM. ..and its very very frightening to think you are watching me..what the hell.

Get back under your stone you really are not with ot at all.

But let’s forget all that..there must be a conspiracy theory to fabricate as to why your post intimating that posters on here work for the LSE platform was removed…maybe just that it was unadulterated BS??

I’m a private investor who does not have to work. I do not operate with any other poster. If you track back I first got involved here at 19p I think Nov 2021..I traded out and back in on sentiment swings up to the settlement where I feel there was very poor communication and guidance and that the company made matters worse by the explanations of why they would accept such a settlement which seemed against all previous comms .So yep their attitude pee’d me off..and not just me as it goes.

More recently I bought more sub 20p at what appeared the cash level.

The company gives very little information around it commercial endeavours and we have no idea the underlying customer ,product ,size of order or whether it will likely be recurring. We know nothing and can’t even pinpoint what an order might look like from the financials released. So yes I ask questions especially when things don’t add up..that’s normal. And I follow the company very closely now…there is no independent research done so you have to as the company in the past has tended to move the goalposts on its timelines.

You making up all these wild and wonderful theories why people post on discussion boards I think is far more bizarre.

Yes I tendered ..yes I might buy some back at the right price.

Do I really think I influence the share price ?? I hope not ..I hope everyone does their own research as I do not advise anyone to do anything.

Charty you have clearly stated that you think there is some cabal operating to depress the price or undermine the company whatever takes your fancy, but certainly along with xenon have accused some posters who bothered to calculate the post tender position ( such as loam likely did) that we were trying to get the price down..factually it ia a small still unprofitable technology company ..if you are referring to me as her you are misgendering i guess on purpose ..which seems childish.

Still no clues as to how you know my posts have been frequently reported but no action taken..seems there is only one way you might know this as fact.

But the fact is my posts don’t get taken down whatever anyone with strange ideas in their heads thinks.

Not really but you are funny not realising that you are making up some nonsense about some posters who are employed by LSE to wilfully try to get the price down of a small unprofitable tech company ..in so doing trying to get the footprint up. Take a step back a deep breath and look what you are saying and wonder if it is normal!

Why are you sure my posts have been reported for some apparent reason ( i can’t think why ..i consider before hitting the button me) but that no action is taken..you think we are all in it together (ffs) not that there is no case to answer being the more obvious conclusion.

But tell me why you are “pretty sure posters reported you guys multiple times.’ How would you know??

Odd isn’t it?

No not at all you are making very wild and ridiculous accusations against the employees of the platform..what do you expect??

I imagine this will get taken down after your last effort.

If you say i make inaccurate and false posts that add up to a conspiracy theory then please report me..im not sure i have had any posts removed directly unless a hole thread was taken down ..give it a go..its not my thing to do but crack away.

But i advise that posting directly against LSE as a business or its credibility isn’t going to go well is it

Where do all your conspiracy posts go Charty??

Are you getting censored by “the man” ..seems they take down the whole thread including the reasonable posts which is a shame.

Definitely a conspiracy or maybe just that you are breaking the platforms rules.

Stay in your lane of knowledge…or hard shoulder more likely i guess.

EDITORIAL FEATURE

Market Trends and Innovations in Quantum Dot Technology for Displays and Lighting

https://www.azooptics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=2581

Desperate.

Troublesome Loam would have had a one to one meeting with the company after the interims before deciding on what to do in the tender…it is not a great vote of confidence in the long term tendering their entire holding. But maybe there is a cunning plan that is not as transparent as that that someone can make up and post?

X

Kooba, do you think LO have used your company valuation calculations and that they now know what the share price "should" be?..

No i’m sure they did their own calculations very similar thats why they decided to dump out i reckon? What do you think?

I dont want to spin anything X i just know the largest institutional holder that knows the company inside out and has been invested even longer than you has just tried to sell their whole holding at 24p. You tell me why that is good?

They have many investments and maybe want to free up cash to reinvest elsewhere ..they can invest in quite a few other investments you know they can move on after all now they had another liquidity event they supported.

I know how institutions work fella and i don’t need help telling me that they bought some sub cash and have sold at a modest premium.

Doesnt appear it is me furiously backtracking..and it appears however you look at it LOAM thought 24p too good a level to turn down.

Maybe just maybe they are looking to replace their holding lower down nearer current cash…what’s wrong with that as a professional strategy??