Member Info for Kooba

Not sure on £20m refit ..but you should work for CDX…get those investors in the business fired up !!

Puff better ..the directors paid over 14p for some!

https://www.hl.co.uk/shares/shares-search-results/n/nanoco-group-plc-ord-10p/director-deals

You raised the nanoco settlement dumbo…i merely posted a very recent article on another case that Samsung lost showing the size of court award ...if you can’t keep up ..just stop.

On Samsung web site they don't mind a porky..

“Samsung developed the world’s first no-cadmium quantum dot material in 2014 and successfully commercialized quantum dot technology with its SUHD TVs in the following year to open a new era of quantum dot TVs.”

Some Nanoco patents around CFQDs are running out of 20 years patent over the next few years…do the maths.

If we had been awarded $400m with extra for wilfulness and an ongoing royalty ..something that adds to the award as time in appeals goes on then I’m pretty sure the shares would have reacted rather positively and the company would have been able to raise significant capital to get through any appeal.

Only reason to fear an appeal is if the case was shakey…we were told we had an exceptionally strong case and the hurdles jumped through pre trial strengthened it further.

Anyway water under the bridge ..

Still trying to establish the breadth of the licence agreement and whether it extends past display. Knowing shareholder luck it does…though im sure Brian said it was display only .

Just looking at Samsung and sensors…do they bag the prize?

Terry that article is from 2016 and relates to a case where the patents were not upheld on appeal…our patents were fully validated as part of the process of dragging Samsung to court.

Got anything remotely relevant ?

Appeals are of course limited but as Brian Told us previously trail 98% of cases get settled before court enforcement ..in the meantime we obviously had injunctions to look at in Germany China and of course USA with successful outcome..that might have focused Samsung with 10m tv sales a year. The longest time span in the Nanoco case appeal would have been a retrial but that would have required new evidence and would be inside a few years ..Samsung had exhausted most avenues already by the time the trial was set ..none of their challenges stood up and Nanoco’s case was to be heard on their highest claim model.

Samsung probably love the Nanocos who roll over for a pittance with very strong cases..as Brian again said they were going to court to get an award ..not prove a case in his view.

Then folded.

Https://www.law.com/texaslawyer/2025/04/30/texas-jury-awards-278-million-against-samsung/

If you remember Terry you said i was talking rubbish that the whole operations and the IP were for sale…as they are. You corrected me ( ha) that they were just selling the operations and would keep the IP and go again…utter rot. Thats you Terry rotten.

it just rubbish terry…pumping rubbish of £200m values and trying to boost expectations to silly levels…maybe you want to try to offload your tenner..but posting such nonsense doesn’t really achieve anything though most know you are a bull****ter already…whatever moniker you choose to use.

anyone who wanted to buy the operations could have bid for the whole company with the cash for a fraction. nonsensical bs. your usual .

That is of course balderdash …as you know,

For someone who says people got over excited and hoped for too much from Samsung..even though NIGWIT was posting dreams of $1b and ongoing royalty payments posting that you think $200m for the loss making operations and IP is rather a classic…even for you.

Ballerdash.

To make it easier..here’s a totally rubbish post …complete garbage.

“Not so long ago in January 2023 the peak intraday price was plus minus 70p. That was when there were >300m shares issued. Pro rata with circa 200m shares, that's 105p.

If the shares were trading at approx £1 now the company would be valued at just over £200m. Given the enormous potential of the technology involved that's small beer for anyone with the rescources to take it under their wings for future investment and developement. It's not out of line with previous precedents for the sale of other QD companies (such as QD Vision) nor with the $130m one off settlement with Samsung.

What is more, according to the CEO, it's likely all going to shake out one way or another this summer.”

Why not start on the mental health stuff again Terry i think that makes you look like a really bright guy…most probably think it makes you look a right tool who is so far out of their depth they have likely sunk long ago…but i find it quite funny as it goes.

Now point out one rubbish post apart from this one…chop chop apparently there are loads meaning no one else can post…yawn.

There is no point.

..For a long time, Apple has consistently used Sony's camera sensor. But recently rumors have begun to spread that this may soon change…

Guess who ? Samsung! Brings us back to the terms of the licence..as far as i am aware the licence is for display use and doesnt cover sensors ..that i think was from a presentation way back…i cant find a hard copy specifying what the licence covers though…im sure Samsung will have their own ideas.

Third time lucky !

Yep i listened to that again today and thought there was a clue there ..think Tenner dropped hints in that direction too almost a year ago …sony is a top 2 in sensor manufacturing along with STM.i guess though that Nanoco are dealing directly with a company further down the supply chain though with their existing JDA …and no idea who the end customer might be…Apple again??

Well from zero …27.5% increase means still zero.

Onwards and upwards let’s hope the shares better reflect the potential in any of the lines of interest across further JDAs , litigation and ultimately an agreeable offer for the operations.

Indications of interest in the second calendar quarter the man said so a couple of months to get an update on that i guess…unless a knockout offer comes quicker.

Here’s hoping.

Growth is forecast to continue, with 27.5% revenue growth predicted from QD products in 2025.

Lovely…will our commercial sales go up by 27.5% too?