RE: Potential SP increase following promising data?21 Mar 2022 19:24
TL
I can imagine you’re frustrated, same here. I think the fully unblinded data might just unearth some statistically positive data; if not, we will wonder even more how the trial has been so poorly designed whilst working with a supposed expert in trial design, etc - hopefully, not a discussion for later.
A key focus may be the impact on long covid, as this is clearly a concern for many people across many countries.
We certainly hope that the company is working hard to restore commercial viability to SNG001. We hope they are planning to amalgamate all available date (if that’s possible) but the problem for me is they haven’t communicated that this is their plan. The only plan is a platform trial, which will take lots of time and money. Where is the evidence, following two failed trials already that this is worthwhile pursuing?
If we end up applying for EUA from the whole data sets, then I would guess the SP could return to pre-RNS levels.
My preference too would be for a successful takeover bid as Synairgen have shown that they can’t work at the required pace. As you say, they have failed to demonstrate their proposed endpoints in two successive trials and there is nothing to suggest that they have the capability to take their product further, if you judge on past performance.
We will wait, again.
At least we know that A2 data will be in before June, let’s hope Sprinter deep dive does it before then!!
ATB TL