Member Info for keltickilla

Ok I will just backout of this USKMOUTH drivel and leave you both to converse with yourself.

I will take that as a No then. Lilgrandma also got 25 posts just 9n this BB alone. All negative. Perhaps you should Futher your friendship and get each others post score up like that holds any credibility of course.

So without sounding rude may I ask what you and you friend pablo are doing on this BB? Are you invested here?

Either your statement is incorrect about carbon emissions, or the previous RNS from last year and testing results provided are incorrect. Perhaps that's all the call in is trying to establish. Those statements were made well before the CC partnership announcement even if you think that would be years away..

I get the chances are slim but didn't they already announce that burning pellets is a 50% reduction in carbon emissions before they then went on to announce the carbon capture partnership? I don't think that carbon is the problem here it's the just the planning and consent that are the issues 8f the call in. Anyhow come what may. Just get on with it and get some turbines turning please SAE.

Either way the No has been priced in. Just have to wait for confirmation or a surprise. Need to get turbines back up and running but I'm guessing calmer weather and waters required there also

I would go with 70/30 now unite are pushing for HS2 to be made with British metals. I've had a feeling that the separate feed into the local mill had something to do with the metal industry seeing as that's Gupta's background. Keeping the "green" tag is important to the project. Just chewing the fat and all IMHO

It's not over until the fat Welsh bloke sings (didn't want to sound misogynistic) but a NO has been priced in who knows what a yes might do (being optimistic not misogynistic again) :). ATB people good luck.

@skier1. Funny you should mention how far UK is behind on tech stock. I read somewhere that the UK are now changing the rules about HMG getting involved in businesses which are classed as a tech company that are being sold way to soon to our American friends. There was a £70mil value limit before HMG got involved but that's now being scrapped. Watch for more tech stock being listed in the very near future.

On the build to rent market in the UK. Lloy can't if got ahead of the curve surely? Wishing you all a very happy new year. ATB

And a happy new year..... Hopefully if USK is at least sorted 1 way or another leaving the company able to plan for our future. It's a No from Wales is already priced in so let's get them turbines turning SAE.

I read it as 1 planned to be put back other 2 just waiting to be put back.

When you have WORLD leading Tech and Two of the WORLD leading companies in Tidal sat right at your doorstep, it would be rude not to surely?

It's not the RNS I wanted but it also tells me that 1 turbine is churning and the other 3 are just waiting to be put back. My suspicions about USK while still being a truly viable possibility has more to do with location and surrounding transportation and the plan of tidal lagoon Wales has granted planning permission for just down the river.

I'm guessing the weather will also hold some clues. A lot of factors to consider.

Got a Friday feeling the tide us turning here. It's about time. Pre USK and pre Gupta this was rolling 15 to 21p. Both iof which have proven thus far to be a non entity. Expect 15 within a year from today which is still very good returns and that's just on tidal side of the business. If USK goes full pellet then expect double that. For now a very good sign this held 2+ for the weekend. If indeed I'm not premature as always. No e the less have a good weekend and a very happy new year people. Tucked away a few more that's me done. ATB

Sorry read it wrong. My bad phew.

"There will also be a levy on developers with profits of more than £25m, worth 4%".
Is this HMG digging deeper in to the pockets of lloy now that it's become a property developer? If so is it 4% of the property side of the business or is it all of the business because I don't seem to recall lloy separated that side in a shell outfit. Correct me please if I am PLEASE .

Agreed , but personally if the NED's job is to represent the shareholder at board level. How can anyone invested here argue with the resignation/dismissed NED. It is imperative that that change happened before attempting to restore faith in the bod.

A non-executive director (NED) is a board member without responsibilities for daily management or operations of the company or organisation.

A non-executive director typically does not engage in the day-to-day management of the organization but is involved in policymaking and planning exercises. A non-executive director's responsibilities include the monitoring of the executive directors and acting in the interest of the company stakeholders.

One might argue the NED role has been compromised when looking at the current state of affairs as a shareholder. Time for someone new to lead the way for the share holder l. Imho.