Member Info for keith1

could have been saved when it stated
a reason for no deal
methinks bg would be a likely cause,as they were wanting far too much
of a percentage,and until that is out of the way
i dont see another major coming in
and they will all know the reason by now

just tried one
indicative price 2.50

you would have expected at least
the reason for the decision
like,maybe they couldn,t agree on percentages
and how much free carry
something at least

you would have expected at least
the reason for the decision
like,maybe they couldn,t agree on percentages
and how much free carry
something at least

how long is a piece of string

based on yourstatement,your name on here
is more than suitable
you would sacrifice everything even before knowing
if we had a deal
or what the deal was
very uncommendable

bond wa snever on this team
maybe you mean alan burns
the hype came from tom bulford of
red hot penny shares
after an interview he had with alan burns
just to clarify

only the deal matters,nothing else
in reality,that is all that it,s about
and any major will do

for me ,on extension or deal announced ,this is
a definate hold,if the players want to risk it,thats up to them
on deal its a hold ,and will rise
on oil rig underway it is the same,up to spud
after spud its the same,then if they announce that the drill is expected to take
say three months it will rise all the way from anticipation of succes
if we hear the drill is going to plan regarding time,and maybe 2 to 3 weeks left to drill
then ,one must think about ,do i want to risk it all
or cover myself by topslicing say 60 to 70 percent
rockhopper was a good example yrs ago
just an educated opinion ,not advice

well said ,
i think that speaks for all

so you see we do have the technology
i dont know if you live there or are on holiday for a while
but doesnt matter where i choose to go
that signal must be there or i go where i do get one
and you can sell or buy just as good in a cafe
as you can at home
providing that your trading platform is performing normal
it is each ones choice where they stay or live
think about it

that is so true,but when the rns for biggy came out
this opened i think 100 percent up
at the end of the day ,once again ,i think
it was 200 percent up,which means if you sold
shortly after open,you made a quick gain
losing your shares
and had to pay double to get half of the shares
maybe you can read into this a bit deeper
either way ,you never know if your decision
was the right one
just an opinion

i am away most of the time,
and i dont see any difference away or at home
it takes two seconds to see if an rns is out
and two minutes to sell or buy from anywhere
in the world,we have the technology

companies do talk to eachother and what doesnt suit one
doesnt mean that it doesnt suit the other
and ,each companies needs are different
bpc are open to offers ,and both parties need to agree
the final offer
and there are more players waiting to get into bpc
so who holds the cards
david or goliath
as regards next rns ,i agree
but stranger things have happened before on aim

thanks ,my opinion and that is all it is
when bpc are mentioned at the end
it would seem understandable to assume
that there is some tie with the rest although
assumptions are not my thing
if they were however i would be jumping through hoops
so let us hope that the writer was giving us a clue
happy days ahead in any case
atb all

re bpc
not seen anything relating to them at all
is this wishful thinking by some reading bpc instead of bpl
or am i going blind

1p within hrs with no deal
sounds a bit dramatic to me
exclusivity is psid to stop another coming in during the process
and you can guarantee that if this fails
another will jump in to negotiate a deal
after all these years the oil price is begging someone in
apart from that you all have the same choice
topslice 50 percent for security,50 percent less shares
meaning with deal you only have half the shares
therefore win only half what you could have within hours
if you follow me,,maybe i am wrong,

it would be interesting to know exactly what
the 2012 and 2014 mistakes were by potter
in your own opinion

nice post ,but
imminent used in conjunction with aim shares

the only way any deal was likely
was the high oil price we have at the moment
and soit is a bit naive of you to state that potter
had 5 to 8 yrs to get a deal
simply untrue,due to oil price over the last yrs
and you know it