Member Info for katstrangler

...guess it also means the company needs to announce a senior production manager to put those multi shift production requirements into effect! needs to stop being theoretical and start being commercial.

...but at least you can now buy at 48!

Think the point is made about the lack of production now...

Ii's or those in the know pushed the price too high beforehand... same outcome, just less meat for new buyers.

Https://www.investegate.co.uk/announcement/rns/mkango-resources--mka/mkango-releases-q1-2026-results-/9593410

Totally agree. the minute responses get personal it just encourages similar replies as noone likes personal insults thrown about for what is just a difference of opinion about the share. so just filter and save yourself the anger and the bb from witnessing the exchange.

Rider, on the basis that the same dozen names post here daily, i'm assuming that i'm not the only one checking the sp. what all the 'louder' posters on here don't get is risk is a lot higher for anyone even with an sp in the 40s than anyone in the 10s... you only profit from new buyers taking on that bigger risk so, yes, i'm watching my pf and my watchlist live. it's the job and, if i had 500% profit i'd be much more relaxed about things.

also, i didn't say anything about rns', i said i'm watching for any news that says production is moving along at a pace that will satisfy the listing... recycling revenue is the bridge to the mine AND to the US tpa. without it the sp here will always be discounted. it's disappointing to hear tales of 750tpa without any acknowledgement of when that'll be hit, beyond a vague 2027, because Jan will be a lot different to December 2027 and that's a big timeline to be holding on faith that the sp keeps its price on that timeline.

Beesty, you need to stop trying to act up your mispelled profile name , stop attacking the poster and argue the points made in the post. except, from what i can see, you tend not to, preferring generic rubbish posts that say nothing but throw insults about. you sound fairly usefeess as a contributor.

certainly not worth reading, even your insults are weak.

Said the same for a couple of months (though folk tend to disagree with that point when i say it!).

everyone focuses on the wider world view but what's ALSO needed are theose contracts... and could do with some linkedin/social media posts stating thei've employed a production manager to oversee multiple shift production, otherwise folk will be talking about tps's forever while still only acknowledging 9 tonnes produced. even the remploy news is great for showing feedstock but it's really production that needs to be seen. it's the weak spot in the whole picture. having a tier1 supply manager to create and manage those targets is the missing piece of the jigsaw.

26 Jan 2026 12:43

I'm glad I am not looking in Chaebaws mirror. 5p coming soon. He's fecked.

it would seem he was indeed fecked... by wads of cash!

(as long as there aren't a shed load more shares waiting to be sold into eod... but just means better buy prices into close.)

Hit 48 y'day... optimistic 54 by close next week into publication and then... 60p ish, post.

Velcro, we'll discuss NASDAQ about 30 days after listing...

Yup! and 60p by friday and 240 by eoy...

54p down to 48p... in only 4 days...

'zero credibility'???

i'd say chaebol has schooled all the the holders, the rampers and the BoD for the past six months.

even now the sp wobbles between 0.33 and 0.4 and that spread tells you all you need to know (that, and the absolute silence for the past months from Singapore/Latvia/Poland/London).

aside from a few here i'd have thought most people's investments here must be down at least 70%. not sure why folk still read the bb as it's tns' that are required, not opinions. i'd say move on and leave this in the bottom drawer. it either comes good or turns to dust by year end. there are infinitely better investments out there...

And the sp falls back to pre buying rise. starting to wonder if £50 is pulling down the sp?

Since april, it looks to me like ii's have pushed the price up, with very few new retail buyers and they've move the price up15% but the next forward guidance hasn't materialised, nor new contracts.

if you're still in it, great but not sure a forced rise isn't an obstacle to new money coming in.

It diminishes the health vitrues of reduced salt as fat jabs reduce the salt intake generally, through not eating as much. look it up... reduced salt doesn't mean much if everyone is reducing their food intake anyway...

not a microsalt killer but it contributes to the slide and lack of further contracts. and, if they can't make micrsalt sinificantly cheaper than ordinary salt then companies wont bother... same arguments for sugar intake and the fact that alternatives just aren't as cheap as aspartame, even though it's potentially cancerous.

watch the spread widen as mm's make their money one way or t'other. 10%?

Half expect it's to deliberately drop the price so BoD can also subscribe at trashed price. but that assumes that the company has an actual future!