Listen to our latest Investing Matters Podcast episode 'Uncovering opportunities with investment trusts' with The AIC's Richard Stone here.
i think the mms are desperately trying to shake the tree , yesterday they put it @the year high to let the short termers out , but the shares were quickly mopped up , today its push and yank (not workin) , next they'll target the long termers at 5.5 p where we have been for 3 years to see if we just want our money back( i dont think so! ), i reckon we could see a push for 7p very soon then a immediate 30 percent drop to see if people are following it up with sell limits ... then a serious push/spike
even though we havent a clue what its about , looks like its finished and can stop tarnishing our aeg searches ! Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice of Defendant Biomass Energy Enhancements, LLC filed by Plaintiff James Pappas https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/21398976/Pappas_v_Biomass_Energy_Enhancements_LLC_et_al
yep hopefully it gets people looking into coalswitch as for the broadcast itself , it was boring and wishy washy and justin deffo needs to do research he was almost saying the boat has sailed as the sp has doubled , but any publicity is good publicity , hopefully hes looking into it right now gets as excited as we are for next time .
1st PART The AEG group has put CoalSwitch into operation Bioenergy Insight The Active Energy Division for Biomass and Forest Management announced that it is launching the first CoalSwitch TM commercial station in Utah, USA, to produce coal that can replace coal. According to the AEG group, the station produces "unique pellets of high calorific value and bulk weights that act as coal and at the same time bring to the environment all the benefits of pure biomass . For the production of cellulosic fuel, it uses low value waste wood , which is produced as a by-product of, for example, paper and wood saws, but also chemically treated waste wood , palm oil production residues and various other raw materials. The Group declares that CoalSwitch TM transforms low value waste material into an interesting and cost-effective fuel. The quality of this fuel has been tested over the past few years in collaboration with the University of Utah. Since February 5, this first commercial station has been fully operational. The company hopes that innovative pellets attract the attention of potential partners, investors and government officials. "Now that the plant is in operation, AEG can show how much fuel it can deliver commercially. This is definitely a turning point in the development of our company, and it will be our pleasure to welcome some of our partners at the opening of the pellet factory this week, "said Richard Spinks, CEO of Active Energy. "We plan to open the station for other organizations and potential partners in the coming weeks and months to expand production in Utah and other locations. " "We believe that AEG's CoalSwitch fuel can play a major role in protecting the environment globally, thanks to its unique quality and the ability to directly replace or supplement coal burning . The fact that AEG uses a variety of biomass types and, above all, forestry and residual wood waste , along with the quality and environmental benefits of CoalSwitch pellets , has prompted many partners, including government representatives, businesses and facilities. " The University of Utah, which tested the fuel, brings key findings of CoalSwitch's potential for the power industry. Its use, according to researchers, should bring significant financial and environmental benefits. The article has been translated from Bioenergy Insight
repost ..https://biom.cz/cz/odborne-clanky/skupina-aeg-uvedla-do-provozu-peletarnu-coalswitch CoalSwitch fuel in points: � CoalSwitch is burned at nearly the same temperatures as coal The difference between CoalSwitch co-firing temperature and pure coal is only 10 � C (50 � F) (coal is burned at 1215.56 � C and 2220 � F respectively). As a result, CoalSwitch fuel can be co-burned with coal without any mechanical modifications to combustion equipment. � CoalSwitch is burned with more efficiency than coal and produces significantly less ash The share of ash from CoalSwitch fuel burning was 1.69%, compared with 9.42% for pure coal. While the carbon content of this ash was similar between the two fuels under uncontrolled conditions (when all oxygen is fed at the same time as fuel), a 40-55% decrease in controlled combustion (typically used in industrial power plants to control NOx emissions) CoalSwitch CoalSwitch co-firing and coal co-firing proved to be not only the environmental benefits of combustion of biomass but also significantly increases the efficiency of co-incinerated coal. � The combustion of fuel CoalSwitch is cleaner than coal, and emits less sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) before combustion itself coal There has been a reduction in SO 2 production of CoalSwitch / coal blends by 45% to 72%. � CoalSwitch contains almost no potassium (K) or sodium (Na), during combustion so there is much less contamination and deposits Very low concentrations of these elements commonly found in coal or biomass fuels found to contribute to sediment build-up in combustion plants were lower by 8% to 18% in unmanaged combustion conditions and by 51% to 53% lower in controlled conditions. � In addition to reducing the amount of ultrafine particles in CoalSwitch / Coal, the particle size distribution of minerals (ash) was almost the same as for pure coal There was a significant reduction in the proportion of ultra-fine particles (less than 100 nanometers in diameter) in the CoalSwitch / coal combusted, probably due to the reduction in the amount of sulfur compounds. � The CoalSwitch / coal mixture showed lower annealing losses than pure coal CoalSwitch / Coal Neutral Carbon values were 34% to 50% lower for unmanaged combustion and 65% to 74% for managed combustion . CoalSwitch burns with greater efficiency, at the same time it releases more energy and shows lower annealing loss, which is one of the key issues in which power plants invest considerable costs Translation: Julie Jeř�bkov�
we've been held in a tight trading range for 2 weeks now 4.05-4.28 close , im sure the chartists will be returning soon (on no news ) , i thinks someone said 6.75 the next target if we break out, i would love to understand them but cant :( , i have buy a share immediately go down syndrome haha
CoalSwitch fuel in points: � CoalSwitch is burned at nearly the same temperatures as coal The difference between CoalSwitch co-firing temperature and pure coal is only 10 � C (50 � F) (coal is burned at 1215.56 � C and 2220 � F respectively). As a result, CoalSwitch fuel can be co-burned with coal without any mechanical modifications to combustion equipment. � CoalSwitch is burned with more efficiency than coal and produces significantly less ash The share of ash from CoalSwitch fuel burning was 1.69%, compared with 9.42% for pure coal. While the carbon content of this ash was similar between the two fuels under uncontrolled conditions (when all oxygen is fed at the same time as fuel), a 40-55% decrease in controlled combustion (typically used in industrial power plants to control NOx emissions) CoalSwitch CoalSwitch co-firing and coal co-firing proved to be not only the environmental benefits of combustion of biomass but also significantly increases the efficiency of co-incinerated coal. � The combustion of fuel CoalSwitch is cleaner than coal, and emits less sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) before combustion itself coal There has been a reduction in SO 2 production of CoalSwitch / coal blends by 45% to 72%. � CoalSwitch contains almost no potassium (K) or sodium (Na), during combustion so there is much less contamination and deposits Very low concentrations of these elements commonly found in coal or biomass fuels found to contribute to sediment build-up in combustion plants were lower by 8% to 18% in unmanaged combustion conditions and by 51% to 53% lower in controlled conditions. � In addition to reducing the amount of ultrafine particles in the CoalSwitch / Coal mixture, the particle size distribution of minerals (ash) was almost the same as for pure coal There was a significant reduction in the proportion of ultra-fine particles (less than 100 nanometers in diameter) in the CoalSwitch / coal combustion mixture, probably due to the reduction in the amount of sulfur compounds. � The CoalSwitch / coal mixture showed lower annealing losses than pure coal CoalSwitch / Coal Neutral Carbon values were 34% to 50% lower for unmanaged combustion and 65% to 74% for managed combustion . CoalSwitch burns with greater efficiency, at the same time it releases more energy and shows lower annealing loss, which is one of the key issues in which power plants invest considerable costs
https://biom.cz/cz/odborne-clanky/skupina-aeg-uvedla-do-provozu-peletarnu-coalswitch
you know i watched it live richy , but i cant remember them mentioning it , it seems a different process but c/s looks a more efficient process and can use plantsas well ,not worried cause the rival has been very quiet since a new plant was pulled in 2016 .