Member Info for K3VMC

No no to guess, after tomorrow morning. Small companies can make do with Basware or Taulia. Global companies need TUNG. Cream floats.

Had a very quick look at Xilinx. Seems to have around $2.5Bn revenue in 2015. Nice.

China, Japan, UK, Austria. Global companies NEED global e-invoicing. http://www.tungsten-network.com/customer-campaigns/xilinx_entities/

chilt, I'm with you on most of that, but the shorters can make money all the way up, as well as all the way down. They can't just buy 6m shares on the open market, or they would be squeezing themselves! They will wait for volatility, buy and sell at strategic points, manufacturing spikes and retracement. They just have to buy marginally more than they sell and use hft to get the draw on the pis. That's one of the reasons why I'll be moving out of AIM too. Gatling gun v bow and arrows.

The best bull scenario is for shorters to close and stay closed! Worth remembering that they will be able to make profits in EITHER direction. They just need volatility and their programmable hft system. Also remember the cash that Edi and Odey have piled into this at far higher prices and Odey very recently. Who knows what Morgan Stanley are playing at, but the swap of 3.5m shares for cash, to be redeemed on Dec 23rd looks like someone is very confident about the 16th. I got away with averaging all the way down on qpp and got a handsome profit. I've done the same here and with MONI, but didn't imagine it would go so low for so long. I'll be buying again before the 16th, once I collect some debts.

Small businesses forced to wait more than 90 days for their invoices to be paid. Come on Osborne! You crack down on late tax payers. Why not crack down on late invoice payers? http://bit.ly/1TxWQxi

smart gossip "They can't even publish an RNS to state a date that they will resolve it by." Correct. That is the way things work. "It's an absolute disgrace." No, it isn't. It is a situation with which you are unhappy. "I can see no valid or justifiable reason for this from the company other than it's couldn't give a sh*t about shareholders." Understood. There may well be a valid or justifiable reason. You just cannot see it. "I cannot understand why accounts cannot be published and investment discussions continue in the background with an update in the future." Yes, you already said that you cannot understand it. "As i said, disgraceful." Yes, you already said that it is discraceful. If I understand your post correctly, you can't understand the situation and you think it is disgraceful. Ok.

Thanks for that, Chem.

174k MS buys. Keep it up!

Advising Edi/TUNG? Either I forgot that or didn't spot it in the first place. Interesting indeed!

Chilt, I think they might be pawnbroking. Somebody pawns their holding to them, takes the cash, does something with it, then comes back after the results and gets their holding back, paying MS a premium. MS makes money, perhaps a percentage rise of the counterparty's profit. Just a guess.

Chilt, did you catch the 3.5m cash derivative, expiration 23rd December?

Rocket79, logically, it has to happen. I just didn't bargain on the shorters managing to get this so low. Looks like MS, who appear to have aided the shorters in the first place, just waited for their moment. I don't do price predictions, but I believe we have an upward momentum now.

Noise, I think you would benefit from spending some time on researching this further.

MS not only buying up shares. Whoever the counterparty to the 3.5m swap deal is, they will be buying them back seven days after the trading update, and at a premium. MS will want a fair whack on that deal. What is happening to the cash end of the swap, between now and then?

That should shake things up a bit.

Short supply, I can remember your extrapolation well. I may or may not have commented that OB10 was a bit of a minefield in terms of different platforms, architecture and service level contracts. With such a hotchpotch, you can only extrapolate so much, then you have to rethink the way you do things. A huge amount of work has gone into rationalising those down to one platform and either two or three service level contracts, so now we can go for growth. We need to win one or two new buyers, lever the existing suppliers on to einvoicing, "encouraged" by their buyers and yes, a bit more TEF would help too.

Rocket79, I think the shorters may have surprised themselves with this one. They still have 6m+ to buy back, which I thought they would have done long ago, but they are the experts at this! for sure. I'm drip-feeding my WRES profits in now. IF the trading update is great, these will catapult like QPP, if good, they will maybe do 30-50%, if bad? They can't go too far down from here, can they? Like QPP at its lowest. Greater likely hood of a strong upswing than downswing. Three weeks until we find out. GLA

All of the development has been completed. What took a lot of time and effort was sorting out the myriad of services levels agreements inherited from OB10. There were lso different architectures on different platforms. These have been rationalised now, so any systems enhancement is more cost-effective and quicker. Last set of results, we had two new buyer clients and revenue was up 22%. The same again would keep me on board. A major user would send this up. I've just emailed my MP, advocating the use of einvoicing and analytics in general. If it can save the NHS £1bn, then it should be implemented, regardless of the provider.

Warthog4, the government removed stamp duty. The good reason was to make sharedealing more affordable. The real reason was to facilitate hft by hedge funds. Oiks run the country.