RE: 10p20 Jun 2021 14:36
Tounguesten
“ Whichever hair you like to split the fact, as acknowledged by most on the call (except Kev who has no credibility)”
We’re you on the call? I’m not interested in hearsay evidence, sorry. Everything is open to perception. If you had no perception, then I have no interest in you. If GIT wants to discuss the point, then I’m happy to do that.
“is they once again unashamedly misled investors”
I have posted, several times now, that the answer given was designed to avoid the question. The question was not answered. The answer given was to a question that was not asked. It should have been answered plainly and it was not. What part of that do you continue to fail to understand. I really cannot make it any simpler for you.
Ok, once last try. GIT asked question A, PH answered question B. He should have answered question A. But he didn’t. He should have answered question A. No question about that. I would have preferred that he had answered question A, but he didn’t.
Any easier for you?
“ and they wonder why the sp is where it is and sentiment against the company is lower than shark sheet in the ocean, a poor company led by an even poorer management team.
Who are they? Exactly? Who are you talking about? If you can make that statement with confidence, then you can name them, right?
I’m happy to talk to any of the LTHs in public, or by phone, any time, as they know. These are people I can have an honest conversation with.
I’m happy to bait you now and then, but your opinion as a troll is worthless, by definition.
:-))