Still time for Kiran to balls it all up and pull disaster from the jaws of success. Wouldn't be the first time but this time is beginning to look different!
Pretty sure you are safe there. The market wants to actually see AC deliver the deal and without fuss and drama. Reality tells me that unless and until we get a positive litigation outcome we will not see a true rally and surge in SP.
Believers will I assume take the opportunity to add at these low prices.
I've been watching the posts with a mix of bemusement, mild anger and a big dollop of sceptism.
It seems/seemed overdone. I previously stated I had stopped reading the sermons some time ago. I'm assuming you have been playing a game and it has flushed a few out. Not sure I agree with the approach but hey ho.
Not really. She is stating what we know - in conversation with prospective partners etc. 'Sonner rather than later' could mean absolutely anything and does not point to fruition within a week or two (be good if it happens though). Whilst some comfort can be taken, I would treat with a pinch of reality salts and suggest it is comforting rather than letting the cat out of the bag.
The answer is to simply ignore said poster - Green Box them and then no engagement. Speaking into a vacuum will annoy them even more. If we don't respond OR discuss them then what can they do? Then we can discuss IMM both positively and negatively without fear of whole swathes of posts being deleted. This is the IMM board not the OTM board.
I get that. I think the medium term prospects here are good. It is definitely taking longer than hoped or expected after last January's news. I don't trade - I'm not good enough or have time to watch the boards but kudos to those who do and win more than they lose.
The ra ra gang can be excessive and the optimism can be premature but maybe just come back when it is 3.5p?
Reasoned debate is welcome of course and has certainly tempered my price and time expectations. Neither the 'rockets' or the naysayers offer that but having an alternative perspective is great. A certain green box would do well to learn this!
That's the whole point. The review is meant to highlight failings and show the way forward. It's taking it's time so either the failings are even worse than expected or the catalysts can't be found or maybe, just maybe, something good is coming.
At least the SP is doing relatively OK at the moment.
No, Bed & ISA is from a GIA (OEICS, UTs, ITs etc) to an ISA. Cash ISA to stocks and shares ISA is a transfer and if done in a different tax year does not constitute part of the £20k annual allowance.
RE: EMH as a strategically important asset15 Jan 2026 22:18
It is possible some smaller ESG funds would look at EMH but even those willing to invest in AIM shares look for a MC of 250m plus looking at some examples on AI. A massive fund investing would distort the market. If you have an example of a massive EU ESG fund that invests in a MC of 50m please let me know
So, at what SP do we expect a possible buyout? Or, if no buyout, what SP would we expect to get to in say 6 months assuming all expectations in video are met?