RE: Greenhills20 Dec 2018 07:29
I think the point re. greenhills is not the fact that he posts negative viewpoints, thats fine. Its the fact that he used the wording in the NOMAD RNS to cast doubt and negativity and then highlighted the almost exact same wording in another shares NOMAD RNS where he is a holder to spin it in a positive light. And he made a specific point about the wording in each of those posts. For one its amazing, for one its really bad. What a load of old tosh. This only being done based on his position in each of those companies. Its the hypocrisy and lack of integrity that was highlighted. If thats not a classic example of people posting to suit their own agenda I dont know what is. And he was rightly called out for it.