RE: Non holder24 Jan 2018 10:03
Yes very simple answer, you refer to times under the old team and as such the current team is and continues to carry out a turnaround very successfully whereas you have to go back way in the past 2007 to try to get your point across.
I suppose you are still smarting from the announcement that the Booker deal was proceeding where as you having invested so much time on this B.B. assuring the investors of which you are not one that the deal was doomed and the new team was way out of its depth leaving you looking just plain wrong.
Then you had put up with pension liability reduction, the team bringing us back into profit, paying a dividend, leading the pack as the UK largest grocer etc. It must be galling too you that upon having your deramping dreams smashed that the streamlining, ahead of the merger begins to improve margins, profitability, market share etc that you will never again see your mythical 100p.
In short Mate, you keep hammering on about lost jobs and old statistics related to a previous old and defunct team over ten years ago, and a financial swindle which relates ex directors and employees.wheras the current team has picked up the peices and are managing the real job of a new merger and turnaround which they can justifiably demonstrate that they are more than up to the task.
You were wrong on Booker and just about everything else from SP to dividend to profits so stay in the past mumbling old facts and irrelevant issues relating to the non performance of a disgraced past team and let us “investors” get on with supporting a proven team who have done the retail deal of the decade which will transform Tesco !!
You have no facts relating to present day issues and I suspect you can see progress successfully being made and you hate it, well you better steel yourself because this company will blow its competitors away to fight amongst themselves for the crumbs we leave behind Ta Ta !!