RE: Monday19 Feb 2018 11:13
easyp - you are joking surely?
If that's a technical perspective, I'm clearly out of touch, just as Warren Buffett was out of touch when he declared he didn't understand the valuations of Internet companies during the bubble. He and George Soros were treated like has-beens by the clever techies, I recall leading edge becoming bleeding edge and technical exerts justifying valuation of hundreds of �millions on companies with turnovers of less than a sweet shop or even no turnover based on website hits. I am very sceptical of technical analysis - lies, damned lies and statistics springs to mind.
If I can dig the Buffett quote out I'll post it, it's a long forgotten one but very apt as it really highlights that interpretation is massively subjective.
Velo mate, you seem to be delicately trying to sow seeds of doubt, as if it were needed, you want to trade the share and next thing will be telling us how wonderful everything is .
The post comprises "If", "probably" , "maybe", "However", "if", and "likely" over the length of a 2 sentences assessment of a short time span - that's technical? More like concise BS.
Sorry Velo, I don't usually have a go like this but your assessment is meaningless IMO, may be correct but it's meaningless, for instance I don't need technical analysis to tell everyone clearly that with the price closing higher today or tomorrow the chances are you will have to pay more to buy in in the short term and if it closes lower then you'll be able to buy in lower.
Velo - apologies for being blunt, but I don't understand.