Adam Davidson, CEO of Trident Royalties, discusses offtake milestones and catalysts to boost FY24. Watch the video here.
REALLY
The real situation is the fear has been created - the jab is just a boost to the immune system
FFS the passport is just a bought lie.
Guess the western world believes in the lie as indeed it does.
It exists on one - and the ******s that perpetrate the lie
VW
Premiums go down - unusual
3 yr fix was same car same mileage no accident no COA and SO30s or worse.
But for the 50+ that should have been an attraction.
I must tell u we were sceptical. The 3 yr was less than the current annual - which was inflated and reduced to prior year then less.
Always worth an ask. It is called business.
I will not be surprised it that sale does not take place - why ?
BB as a policy and shareholder I am quite surprised that the 3 year constant renewal is at only 40% - that suggests that 60% of policy holders did not ask the question - and why not .
Did they not bother ask if their cover could continue at the same rate for 3 years?
sadly many muppets - who will only complain after the event.
Phps Harry
FCRM did not have the high voltage capabilities without Dumaris - lost business because of the EU markets directive.
EV is just an aspect - but the FCRM motto net zero is a worry. Y bcos it is in vogue.
The whole of FCRM business is in construction - so carbon usage. Does it think it will identify carbon neutral diggers which result in no pollution - no every aspect of mining lithium and cobalt involves pollution - as does human existence every day.
This is not a windmill company - and our country will never survive - no winds for 6 mths .
Management churn is a really critical issue. The BOD is more or less clueless. i dont care if the new chair bought - she has no clue nor does any other but the man who got his hands dirty. Never a CEO.
So decisions made by Brade and Turner -(Harwood & Bayford)) will never be disclosed but we can only expect some bad news. Dont lose ur board for no reason with bad guys around!
No harry
Any reduction in Sharp client holdings has to be disclosed.
Elsewhere it was suggested that the 1200 600 and later 600 were but trades between willing parties with no overall impact - ie 1200 one way and 1200 the other way. Could just be a bed and ISA
Who knows and where will truth be readily visible. On the other hand - we need to think that there is truth though the perspective on that is - for me - for the stars.
HC
So my thought would be that ANO wants to demerge the Dunamis side with a view to selling off/ taking it private
The rest does not not fit with the EV thinking.
We shall see.
And we must remember that the Dunamis acquisition was just an add on to the utility service coy.
It may pay its way with high voltage contracts - but it is unlikely that it will have the ability to service large contracts.
Seem to remember BP bought out a provider of such capability for its petrol stations.
The idea of 2030 - silly BJ princess nut nuts - no sense in forcing it forward.
Sustainability of battery components - lithium cobalt etc from 3rd world continent - questionable in the volumes required.
All the major cities have huge numbers of tower blocks - quite impossible to provide at home charging.
Finally we do not have the electric capability - windmills are not the answer.
Needs a measured and phased response - and thought - for 2050 when I will be dead.
Should the Govt have considered LENRs then there would have been the chance to manage energy needs - but they didnt
Holdings as at Jun2 20 - HL
Sharp - clients? -16.7% -37 mil
killick - clients? - 5.67% -12.5 m
HL - clients -3.8 % 8.5 mil
Harry
Pleased to hear that u did not give up.
Something is up though -another 1800k bought this afternoon -
given the cash from the asset sale i agree with u the price should be nearer £1 than 50p - but that is a lot of money.
We shall see.
I may indeed be wrong - but there were two 250k share purchases - there were three with one cancellation. The RNS may well be erroneous - not 25k but 250k.
Why would Turner buy 25k shares?
Daren did not buy one share. And left - stating personal reasons.
Harrison went from CFO to CEO bcos no suitable alternative was found. He went! Harris as CFO and in a short while CEO - with little grasp of the business - and stayed but a short while.
Meanwhile the man with hands on Gas gets to COO - good - not so long ago but to CEO - seems desperate to me - Turner and Blake will walk all over him - and no real chair.
And as I said b4 - the CFO seems lightweight. And with none at the helm - mischief will happen.
Hope I am wrong
I believe Bayford got in when BlackRock dumped their holding.D
Harwood saw an opportunity at c14p.
Each have Board representation.
Yes Holder knew he had to leave because of his link to Mills- the abruptness of his leaving and that of Daren Harris is a concern.
Cutlers previous position was short and the girl who is now Chair looks very young in experience for this dirty hands coy.
Was she not brought in to beef up the legal side when Mills tried his hand?
Their may well be a breach of the agreement not to take the company private behind the scenes.
Since truth seems to have disappeared from the workings/politics today and untruth and white lies the order of the day.
We shall see
When Pattison was appointed and when Harris was appointed - both covered by RNS.
The PR firm Tom Huddink and Ginnie forget her surname- dont figure on the RNSs -
It would be a strange Board if the CFO were not to play a part.
Something is not right.
Pattinson went a while back - no RNS - Jenny Cutler was appointed in October.
I am a little concerned. In the last two years or so we have had a worrying number of board changes, Harrison went from CFO to C Exec and out the door. Harris was appointed CFO after Griffiths left under a cloud, Then Harris rose from CFO to C Exec . Holder then left abruptly just before Xmas and Harris is now stepping down for personal reasons.
Is Mills rocking the boat?
Todays RNS
With immediate effect - hope he is well.
He had to manage the business when Harrison and Griffiths went - he was over 70 then
TFE
There is always an absolute difference in competence - a degree from West of England ranks pari passu with an Oxbridge College . So say
The lab capabilities of entrants from these may differ and will always differ.
The questioning mind versus the tick box.
Dont think this an issue.
The order book at a given date is just that,
orders completed after that date deplete the order book - new orders enhance it.
receipts due for the period are and should be included -
Any doubts just phone Darren.
BTW
There is a lot more clarity than there was when Harrison had an idea and Griffiths did as told.
So Pip
U are saying that the interim figures are a lie - in other words - to present a different picture than that which actually exists.
Dont believe that for a minute.
Pls explain how u "double account"