Member Info for Jimzi

Courtesy of an "a" trade of 99 shares we are at 31p.!!

I meant to add range.

Well we can see that baby was placed around midday yesterday . I still think it’s iis offloading aim holdings generally as can be seen throughout the market but here it causes a rocky ride as such a low float . Can’t tell the bottom as we’ve no idea of extent of desire to offload. High risk/ reward as we all know!

Well done Petche. You can paraphrase point 1. Whose taking the money? Not the old chestnut of salaries? This won’t go below 30p

Told ya, safest share on AIM atm Probably cause no profit trading it !

Fair carnage out there. CPX is doing very well all things being considered . And yet ......... Poor bb yet again

Looking at that Sunday times article, defo had adverse effect. Wouldn’t surprise me HH knew about this before us lot as whispers in the industry and are stirring the pot. May stay a little rocky for a while - like the rest of AIM - having iis is another double edged sword!

They effectively control it by saying you can’t offer it to any other entity if you usufruct. So if they want to go a n other, they have to apply to court to lift the injunction and the case is heard Time, spotlight, reasoning etc all risks to be factored in It’s complex - that’s my point

As the gov are not free to deal with the asset until the hearings are concluded, it is the court who control it until the matter is heard and adjudicated by them.

So I disagree - ATM by virtue of their injunction, the court is in control albeit from an inactive / freezing it viewpoint.

One would think if there is a legitimate reason for non granting, JSW would just sit and wait

As the gov are not free to deal with the asset until the hearings are concluded, it is the court who control it until the matter is heard and adjudicated by them.

So I disagree - ATM by virtue of their injunction, the court is in control albeit from an inactive viewpoint.

One would think if there is a legitimate reason for non granting, JSW would just sit and wait

Doesn't really matter atm

70k buys inc NEX] v 10k sells and the bid for 50k dropped from 32 to 29.75 = seller still lurking.

Can't go one forever!!

Oh dear - looks like our seller hit the bid.

Well independent thought is under rated - should try it some time.

And you take debate as being anger.

I'll leave you all to sign off the same hymn sheet if it makes you fell better - I aim to please.

How on earth does it speed it up?

Its a set of figures for a very basic model - students could highlight the problems - as should have the CEO, who can join me in the heading.

Shareholder confidence - why do you think its going down with reported buys exceeding sells? Maybe get 2 friends to help you with the answer.

So employing PWC is a mistake then.

Can't have it both ways

I know not to employ 2 people to do the job of 1. - if thats innovation we would be back to the dark ages

Sort of reflects the problem here

To show there's a reason.

And of course it doesn;t make sense - its an expensive gesture of foolishness..

PWC are perfectly capable of reporting on the problems

Sounds ok - cheers

Then give me an example then of when 2 professional firms are needed.

No it isn;t and no I'm not.

is the bank balance getting bigger or smaller?

my post removed.

Says it all