RE: Seadrill10 Dec 2019 16:55
As it stands the Seeking Alfa article needs to taken and understood in exactly the manner it was presented without extending to tenuous possibilities.
The article is warning investors to be cautious about putting money into Seadrill at this moment in time and a good example of why can be found in recent history.
Around September 2017 Seadrill filed for Chapter 11 in the US, the result of this was a massive debt restructuring program with the big losers (as always) being the ordinary shareholders where the existing share equity was effectively wiped out and replaced by new shares, of which existing holders came out with less than 2% of their previous holding. This restructuring created free cash flow and pushed debt off into the future. Seadrill emerged from Chapter 11 around the summer of 2018. As far as I’m aware though there was little impact on actual operations and during the 2018 period Seadrill still engaged in campaigns with the likes of Repsol, BP, Eni, Statoil, etc.
I believe Seadrill still has access to immediate free cash flow and I don’t think anyone is suggesting it is on the verge of imminent collapse but because they are currently not generating profit in these troubled times that future debt burden is looming.
From some basic research Seadrill have approx 52 rigs with an apparent 17 currently looking for work. The best way out of this for Seadrill is for it to come out fighting and take on all work that it can get and to me that means the BPC job is more likely to go ahead than not, everyone concerned needs to try and make this work.
As for any perceived delay in contract notice that could be a number of reasons but again from basic research there would appear to be two rigs in the region suitable for BPC. The Sevan Louisiana was pictured in the BPC presentation but I believe the West Sirius is also available and in close proximity. There may be some debate as to which they release for their own business reasons, who knows.
An important part to the Seadrill BPC story is that the agreed day rate is reflective of market conditions and fair, if it were too punitive to Seadrill they could very well pull up stumps and decide it’s not worth their time and be compounding their issues but a competitive day rate along with a minimum contract duration, which is what Seadrill and BPC have agreed, should benefit all parties.
These are all my own views based on easily available information. Do your own research if it’s your own money at risk.