Member Info for Jimmy_Stocks

*30th April 2018

Good news on the Institutional buying on the surface. My only concern is last time this happened at 16p back in May 18, the share price cratered.

Interesting also to look back at the RNS 30th April. None of the below has happened, unless I am mistaken?

Maybe I am missing something on the 30th April institutional raise aswell for £16m. Based on the share price, it wasn't positive at all. Do Oppenhiemer still hold?

In order to maintain our market-leading position and in-order to increase our revenue generation potential, launching the MelodyVR service on a worldwide basis, and in geographies such as South Korea, China, Taiwan and Japan, is our key focus.

"Over the coming months, alongside our continued commitment to content creation with the world's most recognisable artists and musicians, we intend to enhance our core offering by supplementing the platform with additional proprietary technologies such as interactive advertising, digital ticketing, social VR functionality and by launching versions of MelodyVR across further virtual reality devices in addition to forthcoming augmented reality ecosystems."

Number of posts increasing, as the share price increases. Intrepid desperately trying to talk the price down, and yet apparently he holds. Hahaha very funny TOM.

Good post HivedOff. The guy/gal Intrepid flip flops more than a sandal in the sand. I did initially think genuine poster/investor but now for me has no credibility whatsoever. The more they post, the more they give away their position. Very similar to old Pwhite on the other board. Stick to the story Intreprid and you don't give yourself away so easy old san.

Hi Intrepid,
I tried unfiltering a couple of times, but its the same old rubbish by the same folk. It is clear they are here to disrupt the board. Bidstack have contributed to the negative story themselves though, unfortunately for shareholders. I think the army of deramping are not needed currently!

On a positive, since the new forum started, I have spent alot less time checking the chat, so that at least is a positive.

Just had a peek to see if I'm missing anything and first time it's happened but a whole page of green messages lol!

You don't think we'll get news Q1 Roley? Be it either a new broker note, or game announcement, as per RNS quoting Q1 and Q2.

I know Mart, how embarrassing. Sticks out like a sore thumb here and the other squalid forum even more so now. All for click bait and £5.99 a month.

Amir why don't you go scuttling around a supermarket car park for loose change. Might find £5.99 quicker that way. Less debasing to the soul aswell I would imagine.

The other forum is proving a great success so far, and I’m sure will go from strength to strength.

Fact based research. No ramping or arguments for investors to wade through. FACT based research.

Yummy - what does James have to gain personally from paying a 27 strong dev team in Latvia? Could it be that what he has to gain is from what they are building?

If he were a con man, wouldn’t it just be skeleton staff and massive salaries for him?

Missing ambitious deadlines doesn’t make him a con man. They are building out a new ad category. Do you think these advisors would put their name to a house of cards? Think about it

Calamari - the fact you have never heard of Massive Inc tells me you have no clue here, and yet here you are throwing general negativity around in a share you don’t even own, tells me everything.

I gave you benefit of doubt but adding you to the filter list now. Troll

This is high risk, bids need to execute on their plan. Make your own mind up on the chances of that.

So you’ve answered your question. Big boys waiting until the revenue taps are turned on before the bidding war starts.

Look them up Calamari, instead of negative speculation here. They were doing exactly the same as what bids are doing but were too early, over 10 years ago.

Brought out by Microsoft. Look them up

I just used Fitbit as a quick example Calamari.

My wider point was, how do you explain any M&A activity where established companies are acquired? According to the line you are suggesting, why were they not snapped up early on, or their idea copied so as to limit their potential?

There are red flags here. It is high risk high reward. The rewards are massive and I feel it is worth the risk, given the quality of the advisory board for one. Timing to the market for another. There is a perfect storm upon us that suits bidstack's offering.

And you didn't answer my question about Massive Inc.

Why did Google wait until it did to buy Fitbit, why didn’t it just take it out when it was tiny? This is basically your argument

Calamari, I think most are happy to hear negative views, if they are constructive. Your argument as to why don’t the big boys just do it, you could attribute that to any new business. And it isn’t just the work involved, you need the contacts and doors opening with the right people. These things take time. Google have failed many a project because of just throwing money at it.

Look at Massive Inc. Why did Microsoft buy them out when they could have done it themselves? If bids can execute this, then it will add value to a Google or whoever eco system and will be win win for them and bids.

Sorry but what volume has driven the price up this morning? What do you think a whale buying massive tranches of shares would do to the mcap?

RE 3 years in 1 - nothing wrong with having ambitious targets and pushing a team towards a goal.

What makes him so special? Well he has reached the very top of his game in THE industry bidstack are trying to gain a footprint in. I'd say that makes him pretty well qualified.

Don't want or need your bone Pascha mate, thanks anyway. You were on here asking for more info on bidstack, so why you are trolling a company you're not fully researched I'm not sure.

They are in similar boats (pre significant revenue) and valued somewhat on potential and sentiment, not traditional fundamentals so I am surprised you have the nerve to question the validity, when you are clearly well invested over there.

If you keep here trolling this company though, I will come over and troll your investment. Mine will be backed up with facts though, having following that company closely over the past 18 months. Do as you wish

Have to wonder what some peoples agenda is. Unless they have bottled it and sold, then subconsciously trying to justify their position.

He explained that they are building out a new ad category, which is a mamouth task BUT they have made headway and their 27 strong developer team in Latvia has broken the back out of the issues.

They have Andrew House on board, and it sounds like he has been on board for awhile and it was only announced the other day. How funny is it that not 1 troll has mentioned this. All of the advisors on still on board, and NONE are salaried.

It's amazing to see the trolling but nothing is constructive or specific. If these same trolls are in fact selling and not buying (not sure about that myself) then they are going to be kicking themselves in the years to come.

Everybody makes their judgement and pays their money, but for me the guy is genuine and it is clear he/they are trying to build out a business that is a monster of a task BUT they are making headway in creating this new ad category but there is still work to go, which they are knee deep into.

And Pascha, do 1 old son or I'm coming onto the evr board to stink it out like you are doing here.