Member Info for JDAU

Didn’t report it Jez, just not surprised it got deleted.

Posts that are Abusive/Disruptive are indeed grounds for post threads to get deleted.

“ Found anything of substance to actually talk about yet ?”

- not hugely Jez, that’s why I’m posting in response to other posts rather than trying to establish a new discussion.

For the record, claiming random bb posters are probably Colin Bird with literally no evidence (other than they post in support of the company) because it’s easier to attack the person rather than the argument does not count as a post of substance or relevance to the company.

Ad hominem springs to mind…

Happy to debate anything actually relevant but not interested in getting into a mud slinging match today thanks.

If you’re looking for something of substance / relevance to the company to discuss, especially since you want potential pi’s to be aware of what’s going on with the company, captainbob posted a pretty decent link earlier: https://thatstocksguy.substack.com/p/xtract-resources

Perhaps the thread was deleted as it didn’t contain anything remotely relevant to the company or its operations, as is usually the case from several posters on this bb.

Jezzoo, I feel like I say this almost every time the "we need a CEO" gets brought out the bag.

I appreciate your view, you're entitled to it, but it has to be said: all of what we have currently is down to CB

What would paying someone 100k+ per annum bring to the table? - We'd still be at the behest of the sometimes glacial pace of mining..

CB still has my unwavering support as a long term shareholder - my view, for what it's worth, is that a CEO taking the reigns is a fairly pointless expenditure considering the model under which Xtract mainly operate (income from assets that other operators are running and/or exploration which is managed by teams on the ground) - 100k+ a year for someone else to ring those teams for an update and update the market? No thanks.

Nothing magic about it Gix, at the time you wrote that post the share price was down circa 3% at 0.825. Look at the daily chart around 10am (when you posted), it went down from open, you can clearly see that on the chart.

For the record, I am able to see that the SP has now slightly risen, but we weren’t discussing that, we were discussing specifically the period of time where you were acting like the share price flew up in response to news and it had actually fallen circa 3%.

If you’re going to be snide and disrespectful because I pointed out that you were wrong then respectfully, i’m going to end the conversation here.

Again, at your time of posting there were 3 trades totalling about £2.5k at 0.0825 which was the midpoint of exactly where the SP sat tail end of last week, I.e no real change (or a change mainly due to spread).

I don’t really understand why you’re trying to turn this around on me as though what I’m seeing isn’t an accurate reflection of what happened.

Can you explain what made you post “SP is up on that news”?

I don’t think it was Gixxer, alongside the news there 3 trades totalling about £2.5k at 0.0825 which was the midpoint of exactly where the SP sat tail end of last week, I.e no real change (or a change mainly due to spread).

I’m just saying, your post makes it looks like Colin Bird stepping down as Executive Chairman but remaining on the Board as Non-Executive Chairman was a sudden catalyst for a jump in share price, which is wasn’t.

Doesn’t look like the SP at TIR is up on the back of that news… it looks like £2.5k worth of trades and no real change.

Why write negative rhetoric about CB that is so clearly verifiable as incorrect?

Wouldn’t suggest holding shares off the back of an anonymous bb posters optimism, or indeed selling them based on anonymous bb posters negativity.

Do your own research, take other views into account, but ultimately, and I cannot stress this part enough: make your own decision.

“The sad facts are that no one has any faith in Bird”

HotTicket, you might not have faith in Colin (I’m sure you’re not alone in that view) and whilst everyone is entitled to their own opinion, please don’t mistake that as permission to speak on behalf of everyone.

Your views to not reflect my own and you do not speak for me.

I’m a substantial shareholder here and I’ve got plenty of faith in CB, I wouldn’t have my hard earned money invested in this company if I didn’t.

I for one am quite excited about this drill season, considering (as NTM pointed out) we currently stand as a well funded company with multiple exploration projects on the go.

It doesn’t take a genius to realise that all of this activity should create a pipeline of news flow - which is likely to produce plenty of positive RNS’s over the coming months.

The point is Art, I’m not trying to do the talking, spam posting the same rhetoric on a daily basis in order to attempt to influence the share price.

You are - and you’re talking nonsense, which is why I’m calling you on it.

Art, I thought you sold out a few days ago? It’s almost like you’re trying to dominate the narrative with your arguably misleading views with a view to get a cheaper buy in/point to trade from…

…and I quote:

“"The latest results have doubled the strike extent of the high-grade mineralisation to more than 160m. We will continue to step out drilling until we reach the limits of mineralisation and at the same time will continue to test the depth of mineralisation with selected deeper drilling to approximately 400 vertical metres.”

Ref: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/XTR/silverking-project-drilling-update-3z2b2vihqnb1tr8.html

In layman’s terms, If you’re drilling to find the outer margins of an ore deposit in order to define the shape and size of it, the grade has to drop off at some point. Believe it or not there will come a point in the drill core when they hit nothing but plain ol’ rock, that’s not a bad thing, that’s just understanding which part is hosting economic ore and which part isn’t.

You’re complaining about grades when they are intentionally looking at the lower grade part of the ore body in order to define the shape and size of it, you just don’t seem to understand what’s going on so please don’t try to advise other people.

I’d kindly request that you stop trying to dominate the bb with your misleading statements and poor understanding of our mining operations, it feels like I’m being taught maths by someone who never learned to count.

Irish, you’re right about the “no comparison” part.

High grade is a relative term, a ‘high grade’ for a porphyry isn’t comparable to a high grade for a deposit like silver king.

They are completely different types of mineralization.

There is a woeful lack of understanding about our mining operations on this bb.

Colin likely couldn’t buy any shares (even if he wanted to) without it being considered as potential insider trading.

Lots happening on different fronts across multiple projects means that there is a pipeline of news/information that he would be privy to before the general public.

Looks to me like you’re talking out of your… Art.

Colin Bird, Executive Chairman of Xtract, commented: "Our early excitement at the discovery of significant intercepts of massive sulphide mineralisation in drill core (RNS No: 6084A - 13 March 2025) has been confirmed with impressive copper grades in the first three holes. High copper grades are backed up by significant silver assays peaking at grades in excess of 200g/t Ag which at current silver prices, represent a by-product value potentially sufficient to cover the majority of future mining costs.

Ref: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/XTR/silverking-project-drilling-update-k6yszym68px6xtn.html

What is it you want to know Jez?

Next steps as far as Silver King go are indeed contained in the RNS: “· Mineralisation has been tested to an end of hole depth of approximately 200m with drilling scheduled to now extend to a vertical depth of approximately 400m.

· Metallurgical test work at an independent southern African laboratory continues to assess and optimise flotation recovery.

· The current programme represents exploration and evaluation of the first target identified within the Silverking Licences. Work will continue to test other targets that have been identified with a view to quickly establishing the scope for Silverking to deliver a much larger Mineral Resource.”

Ref: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/XTR/silverking-project-drilling-update-k6yszym68px6xtn.html

Art, you're really showing a lack of understanding about the copper sector and indeed about the glacial pace of any mining operation. It's pretty clear you have no idea what you're talking about when it comes to this being a "good" result or not.

Sorry you've not 10 bagged on the first drill result, it must be frustrating for you as a short term trader clearly trying to influence the price.

I'm genuinely at a loss as to how you can pitch today's results as anything other than fantastic news.

Ahhh my bad, when I said the matching trade wasn’t showing I was looking at: https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareTrades.html?shareprice=XTR&share=Xtract

I bought back almost the entire sale minus about 4k shares due to fees etc - doesn’t seem like the matching buy is showing…

Should be roughly a 2.5 mil sell and a matching 2.496 mil buy

It’s my bed and isa, just getting prepped for what imo will be a run of news.