Member Info for JamesConroy

Mirasol, bubblepoint, wg818 part of the action group that lost all their savings and now post nonsense 24-7 on the forums. Just incase you guys wondered why they live on these forums morning till night including Christmas Day and New Year’s Day LOL

Mirasol what numbers you’ve posted so much drivel and nonsense I don’t know what you’re referring to posts or again.

Wg818 not all of us post drivel using chat gpt mate. How much did you lose? Just out of interest. Seems like you’re still butt hurt 5 years later lol

WG818 = lost money in Angus and part of action group moaning 5 years later

Seems like Bubblepoint has lost the plot lol.

It’s always interesting how some posters appear less interested in discussing developments and more committed to repeating the same talking points day after day, year after year — regardless of news flow, corporate actions, or changing facts.

If the investment case is truly as hopeless as claimed, one has to wonder why so much time, energy and persistence is devoted to posting about it — including during weekends, holidays and unrelated threads.

For those genuinely interested in understanding the situation, the information is all public: accounts, RNS statements, debt disclosures, restructuring details and ongoing developments are there to be read and assessed. Repeating emotive phrases doesn’t replace analysis.

I’m here to discuss facts and forward-looking outcomes, not to engage in circular arguments with posters who seem more emotionally invested in deramping than the rest of us are in investing.

Bubblepoint you do talk some gibberish

Bubble you really should stop posting you’re looking even more clueless than Mirasol

Dilution only happens when new shares are issued. Interest and debt servicing do not dilute equity — they affect profitability, not ownership.

By your logic, every leveraged company is permanently “diluting” shareholders, which is obviously false.

Argue the debt is expensive if you want — but calling interest payments dilution is just wrong.

Onwards and upwards in 2026

Mirasol time to let it go Buddy

Mirasol how much did you lose?

Mirasol how much did you lose for you to have spent 4 years here ? :D

Crocqman, I’m guessing these three are from the Angus action group — apparently still believing that deramping a forum will magically claw back losses from years ago. That ship sailed a long time ago.

Three years of deramping a stock he isn’t even invested in, yet Mirasol acts like the self-appointed king of the forum, questioning every holder. No skin in the game, no track record, no factual basis. Absolute jester.

Debate is pointless when one side refuses to acknowledge facts

Because I wanted to, what does it have to do with you, are you my keeper? What a stupid idiotic post

Crocqman, they are very peculiar and rather odd characters. You would think they’d be spending Christmas with their families, yet instead they’re here deramping a stock they don’t even have an investment in. And you’re right — they can’t back up their claims with facts. If you post anything even mildly supportive, they immediately accuse you of ramping. It’s strange that the admins haven’t addressed or removed this behaviour yet.

Mirasol, no one is redefining anything. A default is a formal lender action, not a forum opinion. Until the lender declares it, there is no default — simple as that.

Being “in the hands of lenders” is normal for any secured borrower and proves nothing. Workovers, upfront payments and staged funding are standard commercial matters, not evidence of default.

You’ve deramped Angus for years while calling anyone invested a “ramper”. At some point that stops being analysis and just weakens your own credibility.

If a default happens, it will be declared and visible. Until then, repeating it doesn’t make it true.

BP Default is not a feeling, an opinion, or a dictionary exercise. It is a defined legal event under a loan agreement, triggered by the lender, usually via notice, acceleration or enforcement. None of that has occurred. No notice. No acceleration. No enforcement. No disclosure. That alone ends the debate.

What you are actually describing is overdue or deferred payments under a standstill or forbearance, which lenders routinely agree to when it improves recovery. That is not unusual, and it is not a default unless and until the lender declares it so.

If the lender genuinely believed they were in default, we wouldn’t be having forum arguments. We would be seeing security enforced, administrators appointed, assets seized, or at the very least a market announcement. Instead, we see continued operation and lender engagement. That tells you everything you need to know.

As for “how would a lender recover their loan?” — exactly like this: keep the asset running, stabilise production, improve cash flow, and recover principal plus interest over time rather than destroy value through premature enforcement. That is creditor 101.

You’re free to dislike the situation, or doubt the outcome, but inventing a default that hasn’t been declared is simply misinformation. Words matter, especially in finance.

If and when an actual event of default occurs, it will be formal, visible, and undisputed.

You’re mixing up overdue payments with a default. They are not the same thing. A default only exists when a formal event of default is triggered under the loan agreement, usually involving notice, acceleration or enforcement, this has not happened.

Creditors can allow deferrals or standstill arrangements. Money being outstanding for months does not automatically mean a default unless the creditor declares it. If Angus were actually in default, it would require disclosure and you would be seeing enforcement action, not speculation on a message board.

Saying “hasn’t paid for months” is not a legal definition of default

I am hoping for a series of updates into January and finally get us out of this halt