We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Thing we need to consider here about the amount of borrowed shares and the example of a sudden rise into the £s.
1. Is most of it borrowed by the some MMs who have the financial muscle to control the SP
2. If not and borrowed to short by wealthy PIs or II then surely they would not be taking such a risk when the upside to max profit would be 23p to 0 versus a potential loss of 23p to what £1 £2 £3 …..
Big buys attract the usual “ they must know something “ comments so logically the same should apply to big shorts.
I acknowledge this does not help and makes no particular point .
Other than ain’t it fun this investing lark.
Just to be clear these are the limits so EUA or EUA2 having their Head Office in Russia would I think class them as Russian. Now if only listed there what would happen or need to happen to make that possible ?
Anyone know
Question re below regulation - would this refer to a single investor or a collective rabble such as us in the event of a takeover by a Russian company.in part or if issuing new shares in the bidding company.
Direct or indirect acquisition by a private foreign investor
Direct or indirect acquisition by a private foreign investor of:
more than 50 per cent of the voting rights (or a lesser stake giving de facto control) in a strategic entity other than a mining or fishing company;
25 per cent or more of the voting rights in a mining or fishing company (any subsequent increase in the level of voting rights up to 75 per cent requires separate clearance);
One of the most ignorant unjustified and totally blind headline post that I can remember being posted here.
Blind to the fundamentals that on Haverion just get better and better on a regular timetable. Ignorant to better than average potential on other licences and tunnel vision on SP movement, focusing on one man.
Enlighten me on exactly what he has done wrong or not done at all to deserve your tirade.
A good question Jerry but begs another bigger one that I have flagged before and it is how we finance the bigger costs ahead of actual income stream.
A few on here have said Banks would be falling over themselves to lend tens or hundreds of millions that we need to have in place with NCM well in advance of any sight of income.
Well if that’s the case surely this relatively small amount should have been no problem in arranging a deferred repayment loan with a bank ( carrot to bank being first in line for the big one nearer mining).
I still see financing ( or lack of it) the big ticket as a risk hurdle or at best a negotiation tool that NCM ( they must have a deadline set for GGP) could exploit to our disadvantage.
If they are going to say anything material that has not been announced yet then yes there will be an RNS today but I doubt they would schedule anything for Monday morning as always a risk of a technical gremlin that could delay it and they would be in an embarrassing position.
So today or not at all is my guess.
Thing is quite simple, the BOD are carrying on the day to day business and that means trying as always to promote the company and attract II s
On the specific subject of the sale, I am sure the subject will be raised and pretty sure the main message from the board will lean to highlight the bright long term future EUA has in the event of no sale or EUA 2 if there is a parting of some assets.
As nothing is certain they would be fools not to be hedging their bets.