Member Info for Ja51

Neon You start a new link so it makes it hard for others to follow the thread..... I wonder why? perhaps as all the points you raise have been answered already? I didn't mention Quadrilla owned 75 %! I simply pointed out that the official document to a government organization makes it quite clear. This being by the company that submitted it, With regards to Lucas Bolney, they are included in the application as it was made by Quadrilla Balcolme Ltd. English is obviosly not your first language so i will give you the oppertunity to withdraw your statements. If you dont i will happilly return the favour and report you.

Neon I think you should be telling Mr. Vonk about the FCA, not me. All my postings are factual and are backed up with Links. Please point me in the direction of something that isn't?

You demanded i " Ja51... please point me in the direction where it �quite obviously� states Caudrilla have applied as the operator at Balcombe?" I did!! You should take note that they mention they hold 75% interest and then say they will RETAIN operator status!! RETAIN look it up!!

Nianjabi Is this what your asking for?? WHICH IT RETAINS OPERATOR STATUS!!!! The very first paragraph f the introduction of the non-Tech Summary. INTRODUCTION Cuadrilla Balcombe Limited (Cuadrilla) is engaged in the exploration and production of petroleum onshore United Kingdom and holds 75% interest in Petroleum Exploration and Development Licence (PEDL) 244 within which it retains Operator status https://consult.environment-agency.gov.uk/psc/rh17-6jh-cuadrilla-balcombe-limited-epr-ab3307xd/

Zebra If you try to belittle someone it really is imperative you get your facts straight! The last financing for Balcolme for �3million plus �390,000 charge plus free shares plus 10% discount to the market rate... plus.... plus... wasnt a placing! The two previous fund raises where placings The First for �2 Million and a second for �3 Million also for Balcolme!!! That's �8 million for something that should cost �4 million. What a bargain!. Point 1. I am my own boss. Point 2. Perhaps you filtered me under one of your other aliases? Come off your mobile and get to a PC, follow the links I provide and you may learn something! Perhaps then you won't look a tit for posting incorrect information!

They have applied as the operator quiet obviously! Possibly after 5 months waiting, Quadrilla have finally cottoned on to the shambles that is Angus is and are pressing on notwithstanding by themselvs? More to the point is nothing is going to happen at Balcolme for a couple of months at least. More smoke and mirrors from Mr. Vonk! Have another read of the original RNS. http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=ANGS&ArticleCode=v743vj8i&ArticleHeadline=Agreement_to_acquire_25_of_Balcombe_Licence

We don't own 25% yet!. Angus hasn't paid the next �2 m illion installment unless you know different? No OGA conformation of operatorship for Angus and Cuadrilla Balcombe Limited applying to the environment agency as the operator?

here you go a credible source........Hangover? https://consult.environment-agency.gov.uk/psc/rh17-6jh-cuadrilla-balcombe-limited-epr-ab3307xd/ Anyone with a decent sized investment will get information from any source they can. If you open your eyes and look closely enough you may find the earth isn't flat either!! Have a good weekend mumbling to yourself!!

Another Drill or drop unimportant bit of info Nianjabi?? Cuadrilla has applied for permission to store and handle oil at its exploration well site at Balcombe in West Sussex. The Environment Agency, which issues the permit, today invited public comments on the application. The consultation continues until 5 June 2018. Why is Quadrilla applying for this if Angus are going to be the operator? Another one of Vonk's empty promises? In February, Angus Managing Director, Paul Vonk, told the web magazine London South East the Balcombe flow test would be �comfortably before the summer�. rhttps://drillordrop.com/2018/05/04/views-sought-on-oil-storage-plans-at-cuadrillas-balcombe-site/

https://drillordrop.com/2018/05/03/councillors-oppose-two-oil-applications-in-surreys-greenbelt/

Your words...."Exactly, no objections and everything passed.... " Far from everything passed a time reduction and 5 or 6 recommendations for SCC to consider. Yea .....slam dunk there!!

Erm........... thats exactly what i said! I was correcting Nianjabi............thats simples.

Thanks for confirming my point kenniGT So Nianjabi is incorrect in saying..... "Exactly, no objections and everything passed.... " Well, that's fairly misleading don't you think?......................But that's ok is it as it suits your agenda?

LOL.. watch it again they rejected it!! If you watch properly they had to reject it in order put the suggestion in for 18 months!!

http://www2.westsussex.gov.uk/ds/cttee/plng/plng240418ucmins.pdf 10 . Resolved � That planning permission be granted subject to conditions and informative s, set out in Appendix 1 of the report, as agreed by the Committee .

And This https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/424952/response/1066246/attach/3/Scan2017%2009%2004%202926%20001.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1

Worth having a look at again. https://drillordrop.com/2017/11/08/official-criticism-of-angus-energys-drilling-and-management-at-brockham-oil-site/

Continuous really must mean something different in Holland. Nodding donkeys on Timmers? So the original RNS is wrong or deliberately misleading when it states continuously..........Then the Second envelope RNS with a different GROSS figure BOPD quoted........... then in the interview he says ESP,s in continuous use when we know they cant pump 24hrs a day due to the planning restrictions imposed for Lidsey!

Yes IF OGA approval comes through. I'm fairly sure the OGA will have read the company contradicting RNS's and interviews, let alone the masterstroke fund raise! Probably got as many questions as most on here to ask the company. Wasnt the rationale of Going to Balcombe first then straight on to Brockam to save money as I recall?

They require it for emergencies and maintenance i believe. have a read through the paperwork in the attached. chttps://planning.surreycc.gov.uk/planappdisp.aspx?AppNo=SCC%20Ref%202017/0215