Member Info for itsaduster

Well not really unless pie in the sky carries that value. We still need to show the market we have the competences to turn our assets into value and we have just hung a BIG question mark outside the Board Room. Our skills base is just to shallow to attach any value. An old fashioned Manager is needed. The scale of this mess is of the same order as CB put XTR thru a year or so ago with the Jan fiasco.. Taken 2 years to dig XTR out and its not dun yet.

Not that meaningful. Tertiary Minerals have an agreement which also offers capital for mine build. But it aint much help just now and actually just compromises future commercial opportunity in the case of Tertiary as we know now the BOD are lazy and will not bother getting the best deal but will dilute us to hell when the cash is needed. Nope I think our situation is good with some giant Houses on our shares register. Just waiting.

Nice !! Still want the b u$$er s to crash and burn !! But lets face it we were a screaming short after our hockey stick graphical formation. Once the technical are out the truth will out.

Thx reply mate One other Q if you can oblige. I have in might you might be able to see the factory from your bedroom window !!!! So can you tell me are they putting solar panels on the roof . Hopefully in an effort to enhance efficiencies and to use our own solar cells. On a phone call some years back a rather frustrated gentleman did tell me our IQE solar chips weren't suitable for Northern climates ........ they needed an equatorial location to be economic. Fat lot of good that then !!

Top post. My experience is if the licence expires then someone else can sign up the next morning and there is no que jumping. Once done its done. Like in the wild west. I take the view ownership of the licence has gone else where and BMR and JLP have negotiated without ownership. Which very much underlines my dissatisfaction with the deal at outset ......... ie we didn't get ownership which would have brought licence issues to the for before we got in.

Just conjecture and not based on a single facts ......AIMHO and DYOR and basically a question waiting to be answered. What is going on ??? Where do we stand in Zambia ??

No news from our meet with the Zam Min Mines. Looking like someone else has the licence. Check out register. Are they called Gupta ?? Are BMR probably stuffed and we might have to think about setting up the deal again and include the new interested party........... obviously with a fraction of what we thought and now holding a big chunk of BMR who don't have the licence we thought they had. Looks like our foray into deal with BMR is going to cost us and there might not be any business at all having given away loads of shares, taken a chunk of BMR and ended up without any business. The legalities to unwind all that will take decades and cost millions and there aren't millions in it for decades. Happy days and I was right to think our BMR foray would be a disaster after all. Classic CB mess. for his swan song. We need a ..........

Parkmead are putting together a group of resources based on enhanced synergies and efficiencies. They are also developing a relationship with the Chinese Co they sold Danan to. So clearly they have a plan and have proved they are a savvy bunch. Your 6000K fig is probably associated with their prospective future production if their plans work out. Price of oil going well just now but it will be up and down and in general lots of investors will steer clear as they try to jump onto the EV phenomenon coming down the road (certainly I am) But just now IMHO PMG is a good bet based solely on the quality and proven savvy of the MD and BOD and the fact that the oil price is well of the top now though still wobbly. GL

Some really down to earth postings here. Most seem to be realists and so far I don't see any screammmy rampers. That's nice !! acwoody sad to hear your experience ........ very much mine as well and I am an ex miner with years experience underground in gold and base metals. AIM Companies are usually populated on their BODs with what I refer to as AIM Jockeys ........ you will get the meaning there but their last ambition or expectation is to get a mine up and running as that will mean they have to do some work ....... talk to investors and account for their decisions and do loads of travelling and thinking. .......... Just not on. Bit jaundiced I am. My only real success has been an electronics Co ........ IQE Pure luck as years ago I thought electroniky computer stuff was the way to go. ie pure luck as I know nothing about that **** !! I agree your point there is loads of dilution here and others seem to be Q jumping. It could be Portugal is the favoured project here as this could be the year the Battery factories and the Auto manufacturers commit ......... We shall see. But Cu is good if the BOD want to get going and do something as we see with our competitors. savholder spot on and has it for me

You are right on the button here. There are months of cover stripping to do to even sniff the feldspar. This wont fly for decades But prove me wrong please.

The only Ni Co on his listings on here is URU South African prospect in Northern Transvaal. They are testing the prospect for leaching just now. They havnt defined an ore reserve so ............ nor have they permitted so its just at the scratching stage. The rest of his list is scatty to say the least and doesn't show any area of expertise.

to hear when the new Welsh Facility will come on line. That's a �90M investment in VCSELs. They indicated they had orders for delivery from the new build if I remember correctly. My hope is we are going to out Chinese the Chinese here and grab the VCSELs market by the throat and out produce all on volume and price. What appened to the power market. Did we drop this along with the photo voltaic market (solar panels)

2 essential facts on both the Cos you mention TYM and SRES 1) is that they are under the Manageemnt and guidance of the same man and they are reported as occupying the same building and sharing some staff. ?? 2) The graphical representations of the share prices are in long term and sharp decline. So we know the market don't like them Of the two my preference is for SRES as I am collecting and investing in environmentally favourable Co. The two big consumers of energy are Cement manufacture at +5% of total and Transport which is goodness knows. Hence I keep an interest going here. At SRES we are a very very long way from getting a peep into the market. The ore reserve though not in the bag is mostly there. The big hurdle is Customer approval. This depends on us actually fully understanding our resource and reconciling it to demand and the market place. The market place is in infancy and no where near tipping point but more importantly there are plenty of suppliers who can respond to increases in demand instantly. We will struggle to get our foot in the door and I have my doubts as to the determination and capacity of current leadership to be able or willing to make the effort to get to production any time soon. You will be aware of the scourge of the phenomenon of AIM JOCKEYS. Also the manic rampers. Generally it might seem they are very depressed about a rash exposure and possibly with high debt costs react badly to anything which doesn't support their ideas of entitlement to instant wealth Good luck with the pansies !!

You need help mate Your posting is manic and somewhat crazzed Chill mate its only a BB. You clearly dont really know a fact when you see one. The sp is firmly headed down. There is something seriously wrong with our route to market which wont become apparent for a while but I will do my best to flush it out. Maybe all those other suppliers have the whole market covered and we wont get a look in. If demand increases they can probably supply it. I repeat the sp is crashing and you keep shouting and do crazzed postings .......... nuts!! Face facts

1) I am familiar with fluffed up CV and self advertising. 2) You are only as good as your current performance. The real answeres will be in the BOD performance and I will not be accepting of what an AIM Director posts about Himself. ie all Directors ramp themselves up but some are solid and that will show in their performance. Still waiting here.

I feel this is the case and I am of the opinion it will be able to support an excellent DFS when they get round to it. What we have no certainty on is the competence of our Staff and BOD. IMHO we don't have a BOD with the skills knowledge and experience to monetize our resource. Its easy to pay someone to go and do the drill then announce the results disclosed by a paid laboratory......... and then award themselves a nice salary. So we must hope there is someone with the money and aligned business interests such that a T/O is an attractive prospect. So our best hope of a successful outcome is the arrival of a T/O

Thx reposts. I was conflicted when I put Cu in and I do recall there is some urban development in the way now but my thoughts at the time were that the grade would be the imperative once tailing were removed by us and this was in BMR's scheme ...... ie our activity would enhance the value of their held onto property and mining rights. This is better than the GGs.

TBT the Mining Lease has been mostly mined out but I recall reading that there is still some ore in an area referred to as the old airfield as well as another area. My thought at the time was that this was why BMR BOD made such a big deal to their shareholders that they hadn't relinquished or sold any of the mining property. Also seemed to me much of this area was covered in tailings and the removal of the tailings would assist access to this high grade un-mined ore (grading +10% Cu ?? !!!) I am not going to dig back on my research until this resolves. The big lease possibly hasn't been cancelled yet as the puta hasn't got to it yet ??

........ as net buyers !!

Americans aren't confused by the shorters......... They seem to appear most days post 14.00