Member Info for Irishdemon

Down $40. Lazy sod. Look for yourself.

No idea Mr.T but I am hearing good things about BZT. Might be rumours but I suspect not.

They will disappear forever with the next RNS. Bound to be a 'stonker'.

What have you been 'sniffing' ? Can I have some ?

It is nothing to do with HL. They are not market makers-just brokers.

There 5 MMs and the best actual spread in reality ( if you try dummy trades) is : 4.9 to 5.3. That is 'in size' - 200K

Of course they are genuine. They are known as 'algo trades' - in other words they are computer-driven and test liquidity whilst, at the same time, sending signals between market makers. All quite normal so dismiss your conspiracy theories.

There are 5 market makers in the stock not one- you plonker !!

And quite how has this temporary recovery in TAO impacted on TIR, oh wise one ?

'Whether' not 'wether'. Your version is closer to temperature and rainfall forecasts than being of relevance to TIR.

And the SP continues its relentless decline.

I surely hope not. About as reliable as mobile phones !!

Tiger is run by 'muppets' Clueless as Directors and unable to operate plc.

And TIR going nowhere !!

Forgive me if I ignore a bright spark with one TIR post in total and an intellect to match

Exactly, Kat.

This is a basket case with dreadful management, trading restrictions and no shareholder comms. What an awful situation. Never mind TAO, Bittensor and all the rest of the propaganda. None of it translates to TIR's performance at equity level.

What about the basics ? Do we still have a Chairman, CEO and a Board of Directors ? How do they earn their considerable fees ? Have the lights gone out ?

Anyone seen our hero, Bixby ? Is he still alive ?

True but do wake-up. H&G is at least 12 months away from any kind of production but it will do well in the longer term.

Bezant is not in a position to influence near term supply deficits.

Best not try to imply that it can offset supply shortfalls from a monster like Grasberg. Just not realistic.

As a further word, just try reading the latest US position this rather than back-referencing old RNSs and media releases.

Time to catch-up with reality, Tedwyn. Your article is dated August. Mine is the recent (48h ago) position of the US and clearly excludes copper. No one considers it to be a 'critical mineral as it is plentiful, trades on the 'spot' market and is not in the scarce category. The true 'critical' minerals are mostly the rare earths that are dominated tradewise by China and Russia and thereby lies the problem. This is NOT the case with copper. Try not to spread false and malicious information - there's a good fellow. Perhaps it is out of ignorance and not intentional.

🐷 That was for Weewatt