Member Info for InvestorPanda

You’re an idiot Medi

It’s called creating an auction….

Nothing wrong with our assets - just short sighted Canadians

Want proof? Just google ‘G7 discussions on critical minerals’

Xxx

You are farking talking rubbish again Rodney….

Why do we need to vote for something which the process has not complete????

Shut the fark up for two weeks please

They also position themselves with acquiring stock beforehand….

JPMorgan almost never publicly says “we held stock because we were advising X,” but in a number of large mining M&A deals you can see the same pattern in filings: JPM advising the buyer, and JPM-linked entities briefly appearing in the target’s register around the bid window.

Here are the clearest historical examples.

⸻

Glencore – Xstrata (2012–2013)

Buyer: Glencore

Deal: ~$90bn merger

JPM role:

• Lead adviser and financier to Glencore

• Structured financing and deal mechanics

Equity pattern:

• JPM entities appeared temporarily in Xstrata’s share register during the bid process

• Widely viewed as execution / client-driven positioning tied to the transaction

• Position disappeared post-completion

This is the textbook case of:

Adviser + financier + temporary equity presence.

⸻

Barrick – Randgold (2018)

Buyer: Barrick

Deal: ~$6bn merger

JPM role:

• Adviser to Barrick

• Financing and structuring support

Equity pattern:

• JPM trading desks were active in Randgold shares during the pre-announcement and negotiation window

• Small disclosed positions appeared and then cleared after deal close

⸻

BHP – PotashCorp (2010, hostile attempt)

Buyer: BHP

Deal: $38bn hostile bid (failed)

JPM role:

• Part of BHP’s advisory and financing group

Equity pattern:

• JPM-linked vehicles were visible in PotashCorp trading flows during the offer window

• Some temporary holdings disclosed around regulatory thresholds

• Positions reduced once bid collapsed

⸻

Freeport – Phelps Dodge (2007)

Buyer: Freeport

Deal: $25bn acquisition

JPM role:

• Financing syndicate and advisory support

Equity pattern:

• JPM desks traded Phelps Dodge stock heavily during bid window

• Temporary register appearances tied to derivatives and execution flow

⸻

Rio Tinto – Alcan (2007)

Buyer: Rio Tinto

Deal: $38bn

JPM role:

• Part of financing and advisory group

Equity pattern:

• JPM trading and custody entities appeared in Alcan’s register during the bidding phase

• Positions were execution-related and later unwound

⸻

Pattern that matters

In all these cases:

• JPM was adviser or financier to the buyer

• JPM or its affiliates briefly appeared as shareholders in the target

• Positions were small relative to deal size

• Holdings disappeared after deal completion

• Purpose was execution, hedging, or client facilitation — not ownership

⸻

Why this matters for SolGold

Seeing JPM near the 5% threshold in a live takeover situation:

• Fits historical JPM behaviour in mining M&A

• Suggests facilitation, structuring, or client execution

• Does not mean JPM is the bidder

• Often means JPM is helping someone who might be

⸻

Clean takeaway

When JPMorgan advises buyers in big mining deals, it often al

Https://editorialrn.com.ar/g7-debaten-para-asegurar-y-diversificar-las-cadenas-de-suministro-de-tierras-raras/

On or before Friday 6 February

Poor old needabrain

Plenty of time to launch a counter bid before scheme booklets are mailed and court hearing dates are finalised

Because they want your shares….

Every man and their dog is acquiring shares at the moment.

Don’t be fooled into the negative rhetoric being sprouted here by mathersfingers, Pbow, ToS1344, medi111, stackhigh and others.

These posters post negative rubbish all the time. Why? They are paid too.

We are on the cusp of receiving a counter bid and I am betting £400k that we do

Hahahah killjoy = paid deramper

X

X

Hegded???? hahaha. 22k posts and you're telling me you're hedged

ALL IN!!!!!!!

It seems needalife only slept 6 hours… which the timing is also aligned with UK time zone…

Zoros - Medi111 - ToS1234 = same person

You spruik too much negative sentiment to be a shareholder.

I’ve called you a deramper for years.

Muppet

Imagine how many more posts you’ll have to write over the years to accumulate £400k cash

No one gives two figs what this ToS1234 and needalife idiot have to say as they are paid derampers

They aren’t shareholders, they are muppets.

Muppets don’t ow shares.

I own shares and as of today, I am betting £400k that Solgold attracts multiple higher bids

Noboa is a US citizen.

He doesn’t want Chinese investment in his country. Correa did because it involved backhands.

Time will tell but it’s interesting to see how may paid Chinese sympathisers are working hard on this chat board.

Would Noboa prefer a Chinese smelter or an established western aligned mining company already operation in Ecuador (think Lundin associated businesses) to own / control Solgolds assets…

I know the answer and so does Barclays and JP Morgan