Member Info for investor33

A 10% spread. Those 1m sells are more likely the MMs trading the spread ,- for example buying on the 1p bid and selling on the 1.1p ask. A 10% profit for doing very little. Easy when you can buy on the bid and sell on the ask....

The ask has just dropped because the MMs have opened up the spread to 10% - that's how % much they make through buying on the bid and selling on the ask. To open up the spread they usually drop the bid.

They've done this several times if you pay attention to what's going on.

Instead of obsessing about a currently fairly static share price in which the MMs contentedly make money on the spread - buying on the bid and selling on the ask, maybe just wait for farm out news ?

Another company which I mentioned yesterday has just had a massive rerate due to an RNS it released announcing non dilutive funding via a JV or farm out ( not sure which ) which will hugely accelerate its activities. It went up from 2.5p to nearly 9p in one day.

So all the hand wringing from the likes of Master right now is a waste of time.

BP seemingly straying into the area of defamation - publicly accusing the CEO now of criminal wrongdoing, and implying some kind of corporate fraud.

Do some people ever learn ?

Laughable that this Doc83 character still doesn't grasp the distinction between tit for tat posting between people using anonymous IDs on a chat board, versus people actually naming individuals and companies.

Once you name someone publicly you open yourself up to the possibility of making defamatory comments. And debating the merits or otherwise of a company is one thing, but implying that it is indulging in some kind of fraudulent activity or that its CEO is useless/incompetent, or making ageist remarks about him etc etc are another thing entirely.

LSE and the company were also sent screenshots of Doc83 wishing cancer on various people. It's amazing that hasn't been barred from here as well. If it ever came to court, I would love to hear him explain those away....

I've also unfiltered Doc for the time being.

If I make the time, I may do a similar exercise with him - collecting any possibly defamatory posts made by him about the company and MB going back many months, and then sending them to the company. Given that he didn't understand the difference between making comments under an anonymous ID about other users with anonymous IDs, versus naming a real life company and its CEO and making potentially defamatory comments about them on a public board, I'm assuming that he isn't exactly clued up on legal things.

I've had SM filtered for at least a year, however he is probably the worst culprit of all in terms of defamatory allegations and comments.

" post " even.

His big mistake was to pot my name on here. I realised what had happened via the responses to this, which forced me to unfilter him.

I then decided to trawl through all his previous posts going back 6 months or so, during the time that I had him filtered. That revealed lots of defamatory posts about the company and Mr Buck, which I then decided to screen shot, and send to the company. Plus other examples which I could use in my complaint to LSE - revealing someone else's name for example. And it turned out that nearly every time I had been posting over many months, he had felt compelled nearly every time to respond to my post despite knowing full well that I had him filtered. Very weird.

Proquo ; I still have it left open to report it to the police. Particularly after the second bit of personal info he posted ( which I have a screenshot of ) proved conclusively that he has been stalking me, and combing the internet for private info about me. He was only able to do that via deception, which makes it criminal rather than civil.

Proquo ; in case they hadn't been collecting the posts, I saved about 15 or so highly defamatory posts via screenshots, and sent them on to the company. Some of them seemed to imply corporate fraud. The worst ones were when he got on his high moral horse at the time of the last raise. They can obtain a court order to reveal his details, an could then take legal action - both the company and Mr Buck have both been hugely defamed, with reputational damage to both.

TBT ; I liaised with Craig, who is one of the mods. He asked me to send all the screenshots which I had in one hit, which I did. That included another person whose real name he publicly revealed, in a post which had been on the board for months, and was still there.

To repeat - it's a criminal offence to obtain personal info via deception, which is what he did to me with that unsolicited bogus email under a false name and via a throwaway email account. He then posted more personal info as well, which I also sent via a screenshot to LSE. They had to act therefore.

At the same time I liaised with the company - and it turned out that they were not bluffing when they stated that they would not let this pass. They took action and got in touch with LSE.

He's not banned from the site, but when did anybody last see him post on here, given that he used to post 8 to 10 times a day ?

You will still see him posting on the THX board.

And some people should engage their brains and understand the difference between trading insults via anonymous Ids vs publicly making defamatory remarks towards a named company and the named CEO of that company.

Proquo ; I can tell you that they have, as I did screenshots of loads of them, and sent them to the company. They are all highly defamatory - in regards to both the company and Mr Buck.

I also liaised with LSE in early January, and sent them a load of screenshots, which they requested all in one batch. I communicated with Craig this time.

Master - I agree that Warrior is annoying, and was probably WOS, who was also annoying.

However, when you keep saying that MB has taken the share price from 13p to where it is now, that's ignoring the extreme way that price action tends to happen with companies whose fundamentals keep shifting radically. How many companies on AIM have you ever looked at apart from this one ? I've looked at a minimum of 40 to 50, and many, if not all of them, have had extreme price action both up and down. And that includes all the ones which have recently rocketed.

TBT ; Correct. :-)

You're welcome Proquo.

That info came right from the top by the way....That particular troll was crowing that the company would do nothing :-)

Just one bit of info - obtaining private information about people through deception is a criminal offence.

Re the bid at the moment - the MMs are just trading the spread right now. Buying on the bid, selling on the ask, which only they can do. They like a nice flatlining share price for just this reason - so they open the spread up, which right now is a huge 10% Easy money for them. They drop the bid to do this.

And take a look at GEX to see what suddenly obtaining non dilutive funding does for a share price. It was 18.5p back in late 2024, but a couple of weeks ago had fallen as low as 2.5p ( Master would have been calling for the CEO to resign ! ) After the funding announcement it went from 2.5p to as high as 8.82p yesterday, and right now is about 7p.

People like Master have no idea about the price action of these AIM microcaps - he thinks MATD is the only company which has had big price drops. Orosur Mining was at 38p back in early 2021, but then fell to 2.5p by late 2024. It's now back at 38p. Same with lots of companies on AIM which have had stellar price rises recently. AIM is not for the faint hearted, or those naïve about typical AIM price action. The likes of Master should have stuck to main market companies, as frankly he's clueless.

In case you're wondering where the chief troll has gone, I had an email several weeks ago from MATD to say that the company had been in touch with LSE. Looks like he is now blocked from this board.

This was 38p less than a year ago - what happened ?