Member Info for Intrusivethought

Looks like it's going to trial, as expected.

I believe that it is possible for the courts to impose an injunction that lasts beyond expiry of the relevant patent(s).

https://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-nucurrent-lawsuit-846179/

it's what they do.

The claimed utilisation of Nanosys patents in the production process is utter B S in my opinion. Deliberate fabrication to provide a cover for the theft of Nanoco I P.

FYI Nanoco can produce nanorods.

Just how do nanosys make their purported cadmium free dots and what is their composition I wonder?

While simultaneously actively supporting nanosys’ own efforts

Wouldn’t surprise me at all if Samsung had a part to play in thwarting nanoco’s efforts re AUO etc

The company was never going to be sold. The formal sale process was a tactical ploy (allegedly).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-43-tuAxD1E

Samsung did to Kateeva what they did or attempted to do to Nanoco. Disgraceful.

Hmm..... If Samsung have been infringing Nanoco IP in the production of their cadmium free quantum dot offerings, I am eager to know just how Nanosys are able to produce theirs.

Sony will be very interested in purchasing the company for the display technology alone. Even more so for the image sensor technology.

Samples to ...... Sony.

Deutsche Bank reiterate again so soon after previous buy assessment. Odd?

Reiterate BUY rating, albeit a lower target price of 20p.

Thanks.

Just to confirm, Nano dots now have FWHM of 30nm... is this correct?

TCL have done similar with their televisions.

https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2019/4/8/18301114/apple-macbook-pro-16-inch-rumor-delayed-ming-chi-kuo

Apple looking to adopt mini-led tech for display. Potential of them doing so in conjunction with quantum dots?