Member Info for Inforapennyortwo

Haha, definitely feels like that somedays.

Steve,

I think as little as 3% is game changer territory, i watched one of the proactive interviews on YouTube, there was a string of other interviews also, I’m sure it’s in one of those, which one though?

R&D, I take it there would be an industry standard testing procedure for all miners and alike to test to?

How else dose anyone take steps forwards if not all on the same playing field?

Conference starts tomorrow, I would assume we will be hearing something this week….

Tell me, just spent nearly a grand with new wheel and tyre and it seems the council can just wriggle out of paying, when it was inspected a few weeks ago it was ok, it’s been highlighted with markings and we have a period of 21days to repair, it’s made impossible to claim.

Every council claims they are broke and can’t repair properly, bloody joke.

Sorry MikeyDj, not Mike.

Anyone any thoughts on it being Intel with the links to Jose Rios and Ronald Bynoe?

It’s a new image Mike, looks like it’s all tested so maybe going back to the manufacturer at the BTC event?

Nice find KK, so all tested ahead off the conference as planed.

Great news!

Scrolling down the QBT X page, it shows 2 of the strategy consultants, Jose Rios and Ronald Bynoe, who once worked for intel, Google provided the info before Phimx or UserSteve jump on me like last time, saying I should use google.

Could Intel be in the frame for being one of the ASIC manufacturers? They have offices in Oregon where collection of the MDK was made.

Results, that should help with broker target.

Look how Trump does business though, all Bravado, then he pulls back to what his goal was initially, clever until everyone susses you out.

Point a loss if he sells, need to watch and see where it goes, some kind of pull back pressure has to straighten the books before the direction of travel gets revealed

Https://youtu.be/QEXyyF3Czfk?si=zRkhj-2ClYac246m

Picked this up whilst watching the above.

0.15 just to get to the point where we will be in a much better position once this commercial agreement will be on the way.

Is this a slip up, or the Italian lingo into English.

Am I reading to much into this?

I increased my holding yesterday for clarity.

UserSteve, QBT have said they will be giving the s9 results as testing in parallel.

The results to the ASIC manufacturer who provided MDK/miner, will be relayed to their team as they will be together at the conference I believe was mentioned.

This would indicate confidence on QBT’s part imho.

Jumped in yesterday, let’s see where this goes, come on quantum.

All you can do is go by your gut Mac, could press on, could swing back, take some profit and either release if it rises or pop back in if it drops depending on your instincts.

So how will Gardin make money if he is not on the board of BlocKeeper?

Looks to be a new high inbound, what a beautiful day.

Phimx, not the same directors, not sure how Gardin Benefits? Will QBT benefit though by deals to blockeeper?

BlocKeeper will be appointing an experienced board of directors, including Alessandro Malacart, as CEO. Mr Malacart brings 12 years' experience in the digital start-up investment sector. Two independent non-executive directors have also agreed to join the board, subject to completion of director due diligence; one of whom is a former co-head of quantitative analysis at a major US investment bank in New York, while the second is currently the treasurer of a New York Stock Exchange listed international industrial manufacturing company.

QBT will continue to focus on its core R&D programme where it is looking to deliver its Bitcoin mining software products to the market. Its business activities and board of directors will remain separate to those of BlocKeeper, except in areas of business where synergies are available to the benefit of both companies.

This is what I’m trying to clarify, I listened to that interview after and thought damn, I then read UserSteve transcript and listened again.

It’s not very clear, but Gardin does say APART from the FIRST one we started, so that’s not delayed then?

In a previous interview he said about porting on ASIC manufacturers one after the other, so gather that’s what’s been halted?

The Italian lingo isn’t helping, it’s not being made 100% clear.

UserSteve, thanks for posting the transcript as follows

“... we have now had to delay the porting of our Method C to new platforms for the company that we signed the NDA, apart from the first one we started, which not the ideal situation."

“APART from the first one we started”

If I’m not mistaken then the results with the ASIC manufacturer will still be ready for the conference?

No mention of the S9 though for results. QBT will still be meeting with companies not yet signed to NDA’s?

They must have something to show them then with the S9.

Took a couple of million at this low price yesterday as thought a top up of cash was going to be a possibility.

That’s out the way now.

Yep, I think we will peak around meeting then depending on what happens….

That’s a damn good upgrade right there, almost back to recent high again, this has legs.