Member Info for Icouldntcomment

Heres hoping. Stupid reply!

MM rejected 170 as it under valued the Co. What measures was he using, bacause today, the Markets values the Co at 103. Has the Market, in its complex entirety, under valued his company today and tomorrow will it further under value his company some more; maybe making a penny share of it.
I am surprised MM hasn't tried to have trading halted on THG instead of letting his company be sold off at 103 a time. Grossly under value of course.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/jun/06/sunak-tax-breaks-could-lead-to-more-than-8bn-of-north-sea-energy-projects?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

I am hoping that this bonus award is Results based and therefore is a nod to the market that the results will be good??

If the results aren't good then you, PFC, really have issues.

I am hoping that this bonus award is Results based and therefore is a nod to the market that the results will be good??

If the results aren't good then you, PFC, really have issues.

Are PFC mgt having a bloody laugh!!! No news for ages, SP tanking way below the great 115p deal sold to shareholders and the RNS we get today is that they have awarded themselves a 'Deferred Share Bonus PLan' of 1.34 million additional shares. For what??? Aren't bonuses supposed to be results based. Your SP PFC mgt is at an all time low and all you do is award yourselves a bonus ..... FFS!!!! What a low bar you've set yourselves.

Oil at $110 pb. If this is an indicator that oil co profits will rise and that they will then be more comfortable with investment; surely then, PFC sp should rise, but no it goes down with the market.

However, if there is suddenly a easing of this crisis in Ukraine and the markets rise and oil falls suddenly, say 10-20%, I'll bet you that PFC falls in line with oil.

I know this is not totally accurate, but does come across like that. But it looks like PFC predominantly tacks itself to negativity.

Anyway, must be due an RNS and results out soon. One would have thought there was hell of a sense of urgency in PFC to get ADNOC back. This isn't just in PFC interests but also to oil producers in having greater competition for bids.

I know that pretty much the whole market falls in unison on days like today ....... but why is Greggs down 38p or 1.6%? How could this invasion a thousand miles away affect Greggs. Is there a sizeable group of Russians in London who consider Greggs Fine Dining perhaps.

PFC has been really disappointing during this Ukraine crisis. The markets fall but oil shoots up = PFC falls. Markets go up and oil falls $3 (while still being $92) = PFC falls. No matter what happens, there is always a reason for PFC to fall.

With oil still over $92, news saying the oil, gas and renewable sector need massive investment and a likely no need for sanctions meaning PFC and Gazprom can do business, ADNOC, order book, etc, shouldn't we be booming ...... or about to boom.

Anyway, the Nikkei is up 600 points as I write this morning, so we should have a good up day today. Who knows, we might rise a full penny!! :-)

Double win; just increased my holding and got my average down to 182.

If you want to give this business sound leadership, then Zillah Byng Thorne needs to come on board as CEO or Exec Chairwoman. Her mere presence will give this business some stability and credibility.

Ha ha, Tesla shares went up by $90 yesterday.... our share is worth little over a dollar.

(observation... No lectures please)

The Short positions are interesting here. In the last few months Shorts (Declared over 0.5%) have not gone over 1.48%. Usually when it's a common expectation that a share will fall because of under lying weakness; the Shorts rise sometimes to about 10% and Broker Recs support a fall. This is not the case with THG.

Don't feel apologetic JG68. I was thinking the same. If there is a war then there will likely be sanctions from the west. PFC is a British company and could be affected. West would have to tread carefully given overall energy relationship.
However, I do think getting ADNOC back will outweigh postponement of Gazprom. Furthermore, wars usually increase oil price.

So, if Russia invades do you sell or hold in the belief other news overtime is more positive.

On LSE News Gazprom announced their 2022 investment package. It allocates 1500RBn (£18bn) for energy projects.

If, through the Strategic Alliance, PFC gets, say 15% of that, then that is another £3bn from this one supplier.

Who would have thought it. The Strategic Alliance with Gazprom was purely for the exchange of Christmas cards.

Seriously though. One would have thought that at the time of forming the Alliance they must have some idea of what kind of work it was for. Seems slow in coming.

Furthermore, are any contracts from Gazprom above and beyond the 2022 $40Bn 'normal' bidding pipeline.

MavD; wouldn't that be great, back to £1.20 by Thursday. Or looked at another way, after a year in pfc.... back to breakeven!!

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/dec/13/gazprom-hits-record-income-as-russia-prospers-from-europes-gas-crisis?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

News of Gazprom booming again. These Strategic Alliance deals are painfully slow in coming!

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/nov/29/russia-gazprom-reports-record-earnings-amid-global-gas-crisis-energy?Gazprom doing bumper business. Maybe this pfc strategic alliance will produce some bumper benefits

Typical, still falling and as fallen twice as far as Wood Group by %. Just can't catch a break with pfc