Member Info for Ibug

Argus
So all the gear that has been brought on to site for the last 3 to 8 days and not used is costing us how much in rental?

GrumpyGreta

They cannot carry out any of the site improvements until they complete the 2018 Planning Application conditions.

This is on page 1

IMPORTANT CONDITION NUMBERS 8, 11, 16, 19, 24 MUST BE DISCHARGED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT

https://planning.surreycc.gov.uk/DisplayImage.aspx?doc=cmVjb3JkX251bWJlcj01NjAwKmZpbGVuYW1lPVxcREVGXE1hc3RlckdvdlxEb2N1bWVudHNcUGxhbm5pbmdcU0NDIFJlZiAyMDE4LTAxNTJcRGVjaXNpb24gTm90aWNlLnBkZippbWFnZV9udW1iZXI9MTcwOC4wMDAwKmltYWdlX3R5cGU9cGxhbm5pbmcqbGFzdF9tb2RpZmllZF9mcm9tX2Rpc2s9MDEvMDEvMDAwMSAwMDowMDowMA==

Argus
1 tanker a day is not 290+ bopd unless you are a ramper. No doubt you go to rose coloured specsavers for you prescriptions.

It is the same as your continued post about brent rising. It never seems to drop and yet this year it has dropped from $70.74 down to $53.34 before starting to rise again. You really are full of BS.
https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/brent-crude-oil

As used at BB would be a better example imo

https://twitter.com/UKOGlistedonAIM/status/907855246440976386/photo/1

4th Planning Application submitted.

Details of a Surface Water Drainage Scheme submitted pursuant to Condition 24 of planning permission ref: RE18/02667/CON dated 27 September 2019

04/02/20 Appendix B part 2 (3401kb)
04/02/20 Appendix B part 3 (6314kb)
04/02/20 Appendix A - Covering Letter and App form - redacted (6431kb)
04/02/20 Appendix B part 1 (6000kb)

Public consultation end date 12/03/2020

https://planning.surreycc.gov.uk/planappdisp.aspx?AppNo=SCC%20Ref%202020/0019

IMPORTANT CONDITION NUMBERS 8, 11, 16, 19, 24 MUST BE DISCHARGED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT

Just Condition 19 left to be submitted.

Contamination
19. Prior to the commencement of the development hereby permitted a Construction Environment Management Plan (CEMP) for the construction works of the process, storage and tanker area shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the County Planning Authority. The CEMP shall apply to the construction of such works that include (but not limited to):
• Quality Assurance Plan (CQA Plan) for the: perimeter bunding; the earthworks engineering; retaining structures; containment membrane design and its sealing; pavements and floor slabs (including foundation layers); structure foundations; including geotechnical assessment and design methodology;
• Monitoring systems, including testing, inspection and maintenance protocol, including the groundwater monitoring wells.

With 1 condition still outstanding can't see them starting on anything new until Q3 now considering the way SCC moves.

What kit has arrived on site that makes you think it is for HH-2 then? You are the only one spreading negativity. I say again. It is the same kit they used on HH-1 2 weeks ago. What is wrong with that. There is nothing there that indicates it is for HH-2. No workover rig. No PLT. No more from me on the subject as it's just wasting my time.

Scsiborg
You read too much into other posts. I would have thought it was perfectly clear considering there are two options for why kit is arriving on the site.

What is negative about getting HH-1 into dual completion?

Scsiborg
What I'm saying is we don't know what the kit is for. Just that it is the same kit they used on the 29th January. If you think it is for HH-2 fine. It could be for HH-1n though.

I don't see any of the new kit anywhere near HH-2 in the pictures or video.

Scsiborg
If you don't pay attention to what is put on twitter that is your problem.
PW Well testing vehicle
Big orange bit of kit with exhaust on top.

Daft question but how do we know it is for HH-2Z? It is exactly the same kit they used on HH-1 on the 29th Jan.

https://www.londonstockexchange.com/products-and-services/market-data/realtimedata/data/infolect.htm

12-Feb-20 15:18:21 0.6288 159 Buy* 0.60 0.65 1.00 O
12-Feb-20 15:15:25 0.6288 1,033 Buy* 0.60 0.65 6.50 O
12-Feb-20 15:15:16 0.601 26 Sell* 0.60 0.65 0.16 O
12-Feb-20 15:13:20 0.6288 187 Buy* 0.60 0.65 1.18 O
12-Feb-20 15:13:17 0.6288 174 Buy* 0.60 0.65 1.09 O
12-Feb-20 15:12:24 0.6288 238 Buy* 0.60 0.65 1.50 O
12-Feb-20 15:12:16 0.601 580 Sell* 0.60 0.65 3.49 O
12-Feb-20 15:11:09 0.601 480 Sell* 0.60 0.65 2.88 O
12-Feb-20 15:11:06 0.6288 47 Buy* 0.60 0.65 0.30 O
12-Feb-20 15:10:20 0.6288 131 Buy* 0.60 0.65 0.82 O
12-Feb-20 15:10:20 0.6288 365 Buy* 0.60 0.65 2.30 O
12-Feb-20 15:10:16 0.6288 411 Buy* 0.60 0.65 2.58 O
12-Feb-20 15:09:55 0.6288 15 Buy* 0.60 0.65 0.09 O
12-Feb-20 15:08:20 0.6288 9,439 Buy* 0.60 0.65 59.35 O
12-Feb-20 15:07:34 0.6288 159 Buy* 0.60 0.65 1.00 O
12-Feb-20 15:07:03 0.601 1,612 Sell* 0.60 0.65 9.69 O
12-Feb-20 15:07:02 0.601 85 Sell* 0.60 0.65 0.51 O
12-Feb-20 15:05:49 0.601 572 Sell* 0.60 0.65 3.44 O
12-Feb-20 15:05:39 0.6288 15 Buy* 0.60 0.65 0.09 O
12-Feb-20 15:05:38 0.6288 3 Buy* 0.60 0.65 0.02 O
12-Feb-20 15:00:53 0.6288 2,385 Buy* 0.60 0.65 15.00

Set behind the front ones are not. I put it through moviemaker and they were not turning either.

Co-incidence or not? Is that the same 132m shares?

"On December 31, 2019, prior to the allotment of the second tranche of consideration shares issued by UKOG to Tellurian Investments LLC as described herein, Tellurian Investments LLC held 132,322,260 shares of UKOG representing on that date approximately 1.9% of the total shares outstanding of UKOG listed on AIM. So after the December 31, 2019 allotement, Tellurian Investments LLC held a total of 463,448,088 ordinary shares representing approximately 6.4% of the total voting rights."

Mirasol
Perhaps you should read the RNS rather than the FDP guidance. Says and does are not the same.

"Subsequent phases, involving further infill production wells and a possible water reinjection well, are planned to be submitted as FDP addenda in the coming year once longer-term well behaviour is more comprehensively understood. "

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/UKOG/hh-1-and-hh-2z-extended-well-test-update-xjk6frv4uqebsr1.html

Mirasol
FDP is only for the wells drilled.

"Further possible infill wells, water injection and additional gas utilisation will be addressed via subsequent FDP addenda and submitted to the OGA for consent at the appropriate time."

Over 9m shares have been returned to sender this week. 2m of those were today.

Taken from planning application.

"1.2 The Need for a Further Extension of Time
The future use of the Broadford Bridge Site will be determined by the appraisal of the following well sites targeting the same Kimmeridge limestone and Portland sandstone reserves:
• Horse Hill Well Site
The 2nd amendment consent was predicated upon the delivery of further information from HH-1 but unfortunately drilling has not progressed as quickly as originally envisaged (which is indicative of the uncertainty when seeking to retrieve and accurately interpret data from deep below ground). The drilling HH-2 was originally planned for 2018 but only commenced 29th September 2019. It is now due to complete in 2019, with the appraisal of HH-1 and HH-2 in 2020.
• Loxley Well Site
In June 2019, the Applicant applied to Surrey County Council for a mineral planning consent to authorise hydrocarbon exploration, testing and appraisal from a new well site on land to the east of Dunsfold, Surrey. This well site is in the same Petroleum Exploration and Development Licence area (PEDL-234) as Broadford Bridge and will test the same Kimmeridge limestone and Portland sandstone reserves. This application is due to be determined late-2019/early-2020 and, if consented, the site would be operational in 2020/21.
Data from above-named sites will help determine the extent of the reserves, the mix of hydrocarbons, the flow rates and the pressures at play within the target formations. This information will help determine the need for further testing and appraisal at Broadford Bridge and its potential for commercial success. Put simply, the data is critical for the future planning of the Broadford Bridge Site."