RE: Loxley12 Apr 2023 08:06
And still moneymunch can't read and understand the Inspectors decision.
"Planning conditions
31. The Secretary of State has given consideration to the Inspector’s analysis at IR10.1-10.14, the recommended conditions set out at the end of the IR and the reasons for them, and to national policy in paragraph 56 of the Framework and the relevant Guidance. He is satisfied that the conditions recommended by the Inspector comply with the policy test set out at paragraph 56 of the Framework and that the conditions set out at Annex B should form part of his decision.
36. The Secretary of State therefore concludes that the appeal should be allowed, and planning permission granted, subject to conditions.
Formal decision
37. Accordingly, for the reasons given above, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s recommendation. He hereby allows your client’s appeal and grants planning permission subject to the conditions set out in Annex B of this decision letter for the construction, operation and decommissioning of a well site for the exploration and appraisal of hydrocarbon minerals from one exploratory borehole (Loxley-1) and one side - track borehole (Loxley - 1z) for a temporary period of three years involving the siting of plant and equipment, the construction of a new access track, a new highway junction with High Loxley Road, highway improvements at the junction of High Loxley Road and Dunsfold Road and the erection of a boundary fence and entrance gates with restoration to agriculture, in accordance with application Ref. WA/2019/0796, dated 26 April 2019."
Loxley only has has 32 conditions. No doubt MM will brush them under the carpet but there more there than there were at HH.
If you want to tie your money up for over 2 years go ahead. The canny investors know better.
Not the old tanker trick?