Member Info for hyper-al

So have I got this correct? Energold have purchased Juno stake? Struggling reading the RNS on my mobile phone. If so I think this is huge. Big changes ahead. Could someone confirm this is correct?

EarlofAim. You need to do more research on the proposed mine, before ramping some mine unknown to many on this thread. Quote from today's RNS "The blend was 3.3 (White Rock) to 1.0 (Engine Zone), similar to the contribution that is expected to be delivered from the mine in the early years of production, prior to the Northern Copper Zone commencing." I believe the White Rock will be mined during the creation of the access adit or shaft. The fact that they can extract value during the approach to the main target, the Northern Copper zone, means that they have much of the capital costs covered before reaching the main zone. Surely that's a big positive.

The fact that we have actually struck a deal with the Mali government where they take a stake is great news. I did see a local news story about 8 months ago about protests against certain mining operations not contributing to the nation. The fact that we have a procedure in place to do business with the Mali government may open up other opportunities. Maybe other lithium concessions could merge with us, just a thought.

These changes are common. It will be very interesting to see who replaces Jo. I'm hoping it's someone who can get excited about Grängesberg and someone with experience in one of the bigger mining corporations, who will actually move things forward at a faster pace and attract funding on a larger scale to support rapid progress. AYM needs a push. Exciting times ahead, as always, imho.

I thought this was interesting. A global mining giant working with a Swedish green steel producer. https://otp.investis.com/clients/uk/anglo_american2/rns/regulatory-story.aspx?cid=49&newsid=1679174 I assume the process will become even greener if the ore is not shipped all the way from South America but produced locally in Sweden.

It won't be the Irish mining in Grangesberg, Sweden.

As for using diesel underground, new mines are moving to electric vehicles/machinery, although more expensive, lack of exhaust emissions reduces the capex required for ventilation equipment to remove noxious gasses from burning hydrocarbons underground. So the costs balance out and you get a healthier working environment underground.

For your info the bronze age workings at Parys go to a depth of 20 fathoms. And that is not scratching the surface, it was not an open pit. Hopefully you will be a bit less clueless now! https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/proceedings-of-the-prehistoric-society/article/abs/copper-mining-in-the-bronze-age-at-mynydd-parys-anglesey-wales/0D5D16EE3A7153666945AEBAD5E6C672

Robevs100 hopefully this link will suppy you the information. It is in pdf format https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/ukla/pn-907-1.pdf

Ores are minerals containing the metals, I doubt they will be mining native metals. I worked in the mineral/oil/gas industry for 17 years. Not sure what skills you have, apart from being abusive.

Lol, who's the half whit, Parys mountain has been mined for thousands of years, you should know that as it tells you the history on their website. Read here https://www.angleseymining.co.uk/introduction-history/ I assumed that because you only mentioned 300 years of mining history you were talking about Grängesberg, not that Grängesberg goes back that far.

Anglesey Mining is a mineral exploration company. I have followed it since the 1980's and that's certainly what it has being doing since then. As for the 300 year old iron mine in Sweden, what has ago got to do with it, it was last.in operation just some 40 years ago and has significant resources, including an iron ore that is open at depth, Apatite which was previously just dumped as waste and now is in high demand. The green economy is fueling demand for high grade iron ore for arc and hydrogen furnaces and the move from hydrocarbon based fertilizer is increasing the demand and adding value to Apatite and other fertilizer minerals.And the same for REE. In my opinion hese huge Apatite iron deposits are not going to stay in the ground for much longer particularly in Sweden which needs to cash in these resources to improve it's economy. Obviously like any mine startup economics have to be proven, but it's a heck of a lot easier in a historic mining area with its known geology, decades of exploration and academic research, along with environmental impacts from previous workings that can only be improved with regeneration. Good luck with your .5p target, that would give AYM a market cap of less than £3m would their freehold land not be worth more than that? Let alone all the minerals within that land. Plus everything else they own and you really think the SP will hit 0.5p ? In my opinion, dyor, the only event which would cause such a drop would be a tree shake to activate all the stop losses before a massive rise, but that concept is as crazy as your 0.5p prediction.

Sharehuzzarski

It is an exploration company, so dilution is expected. Important to do your own research before investing in any exploration company, same with any investment really.

Looks like facilities will be available on site for Apatite processing from this tailings project (see video) before our mine starts, so no capex required for Apatite processing from mine output. A massive positive!

Long YouTube video all about Phosphorus in Sweden, including at 52:45 into video about the 'The Grängesberg Apatite Project' see

https://youtu.be/p71PSBltSC0?feature=shared&t=3184 video should start at the Apatite Project

I had not seen this video until today. Jo talking about Grangesberg. Apatite mentioned, but not REE. https://youtu.be/rFsSUrcurFY?feature=shared

This document pdf is by one of the GIAB directors. A very knowledgeable person on the subject of mine automation and I assume very well connected within this industry. https://abmec.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Andreas-Simoncic-Sandvik-Presentation-ABMEC-Conference-2019-Ver.1.pdf

Sharehuzzerski, ok it's not quite ours yet, but we have the option to take 100% Last financial results state "A 49.7% interest in the Grängesberg Iron project in Sweden, up from 19.9% last year. Anglesey has management rights and a right of first refusal to increase the Group’s interest to 100%."

This scientific paper is certainly worth a look it's in pdf format https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257044663_Textural_relations_and_mineral_chemistry_of_REE_in_the_Grangesberg_apatite-iron_oxide_deposit_Sweden_the_role_of_fluids. Or www.researchgate.net/publication/257044663_Textural_relations_and_mineral_chemistry_of_REE_in_the_Grangesberg_apatite-iron_oxide_deposit_Sweden_the_role_of_fluids

Catbert, thank you for your excellent post. If apatite is produced in such large quantities as a by product of the iron mining, I wonder how much Apatite remains in the ground that has been ignored and not mined, could well be massive untapped resources of Apatite. These fertilizer minerals will become essential as the world transitions away from hydrocarbon produced fertilizer. To show how essential these mined fertilizers are becoming just look at the massive £2b Woodsmith polyhalite mine just opening in England see www.youtu.be/u0pI7BjBha8?feature=shared . Note the Woodsmith mine is owned by Anglo American, who are starting to take an interest in Sweden, see my other post. Maybe our old mine records can give us investors a clue to the quantity of Apatite still remaining in the ground. More research certainly needed. :)