Member Info for hyper-al

Were the company projections based on 70+% ore prices?

Looking at the charts here https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/iron-ore it looks like iron ore cargoes with a 63.5% iron ore content will be way above £125 for a while. But these prices are for low grade ore. The ore that was produced by Grängesberg is over 70% so is a premium product that is required for the new electric and hydrogen furnaces. Can anyone find the current and historic prices for 70+% ore?

You are heading into your scientific field. In the case of drugs we now supposedly have trials that catch problems before they happen in humans. The quality of trials in 1960 was not the same as now. Tobacco has been smoked for hundreds of years, the science understanding required to assess risk from smoking only came in some 80 years ago.

"Just so happens that we started measuring temperatures and recording the data at the coldest point in the last 10,000 years..." Nonsense, we have accurate data going back 1.5million years see this graph for past 800k years https://www.co2levels.org/ you will need to click button in top left of that page to see all the data, the look how much CO2 is above all previous peaks. This data is scientific fact taken from ice cores, if you deny this data, then you are not a scientist.

Oh and science is never settled...so when someone tells you to “follow the science “ that means be in our cult.

That's insane. Science is based on evidence and fact. It's not some insane religious cult. Who the heck is brainwashing you with this crap? My background is geophysics. In fact I helped discover some large oil/gas fields in the early 80's. Yep it's insane us scientists found the very stuff we are now telling you to stop using. The oil and gas industry is only there because of science, so on your reasoning supporting that industry is also a cult. I don't understand why some people can't cope with change. I mean if I can go from working in the industry finding oil and gas to asking for all oil and gas exploration and production to stop, because of my scientific understanding of the facts, I really can't understand why others can not cope with the same transition over a few decades.

"Climate change is real, it happens naturally as the earth goes through warming and cooling cycles."

That statement is correct, what you are ignoring and what really matters, is the additional burden created by humans on top of the natural cycle and the speed of change in the climate that will result because of that additional burden. At no time in the history of humanity have CO2 levels been so high and still rapidly increasing. This is levels way above any natural occurring cycles during human history. There are scientific papers from all over the world from major universities and leaders in science confirming this. So why do you deny the majority view of 99.95% of scientific experts in the field?

Watcher36 that last post was for you, sorry everyone else. That Antarctica video is certainly worth a watch.

If you don't believe in climate change, then you don't believe in science. Without science you would have no internet, and you would not be able to communicate your anti science over the internet. Why don't you believe in the science behind climate change? The melting of Antarctica is real, but you will probably only believe it when the world's coastal cities are in the sea permanently under water. If you don't understand and/or deny the science here, https://www.youtube.com/live/SZwbfLmklvY?feature=shared then all I can say is you need to get learning and don't allow yourself to get brainwashed by the anti science groups.

Nice buy at 1.6p

Yep. I think one of the directors at Grängesberg Iron AB is highly knowledgeable on hi tech environmental mining and works for one of the large Scandinavian mining equipment manufacturers.

There is certainly a rush to extract all metals required for the transition from fossil fuels. Copper is critical.

An old report, just placing here for future reference https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/534588/1/MRP112_WF90004.pdf

Plenty of mineralisation out with our exploration area, but any connections? https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/11845/1/WFMR82051.pdf

In the 1980s some detailed gravity work was done over the Parys Mt and wider area. Whatever happened to this data? I'm sure I remember a residual gravity anomaly extending to the north of Parys Mt. The company should make better use of geophysics to help with locating drilling targets and expanding the resource. Gravity map of Anglesey, unfortunately not the detailed survey, https://largeimages.bgs.ac.uk/iip/mapsportal.html?id=1004924

"am quite surprised more have not bought" just so few smaller investors in AIM these days, just not the free cash around anymore. It's quite unfortunate as some companies on AIM seem to be approaching very positive tipping points, wish I could put more into the market.

Unfortunately I don't have an X account. Anything interesting mentioned?

On the AYM website https://www.angleseymining.co.uk/ they list the existing projects then state "Anglesey is also actively reviewing other compatible base metal projects suitable for incorporation into the Anglesey Group." With all the current news could a merger or an RTO about to be taking place. Maybe the move into AIM was to help facilitate such a move. Also the title "Committed to sustainable mining in the 21st Century" sounds very grand for what is in reality currently quite a small exploration company. This title sounds more like the words of a company like AngloAmerican see https://uk.angloamerican.com/sustainable-mining , with it's Woodsmith polyhalite mine in England's, North York Moors, if they became involved it would be a dream come true. Certainly AYM do hold the key to some large resources, particularly Grängesberg Iron, Apatite, REE and certain companies do like fertilisers. And the proximity of Parys Mt to the sea could also facilitate a low impact mine design like Woodsmith. Just some more of my thoughts and dreams, but probably totally wrong. No investment advice intended. DYOR.

I can't find anything connecting Energold Minerals Inc with Energold group, so probably not connected. But research Energold Minerals Inc, some interesting stuff can be found.

I mean Juno gone, after decades of involvement and now no stake. A plan must be in place for change. Very exciting. I still think the Swedish Iron, Apatite, REE is the hidden gem.

Check out the current directors of Energold Minerals.