Member Info for howezap

Do wonder which posters you would consider to be not sincere jb. I would wish ‘all’ posters popular or non popular have a good weekend, regardless of agenda, race, sexual orientation or age. 😊

Ice- “Normally when there is positive outcome there will be an immediate NR”

Not where a producer in concerned now as is AMRQ, an explorer will typically even use individual drill results as part of their PR stratergy to rally the ‘capital’ market as most junior explorers typically do not have an income stream and rely on raising capital from the market for the next exploration phase.

What is far more important now they will focus toward are the more routine annual MRE updates. MRE4 for example was reported using a cut-off grade of 5.9 g/t Au, now with mining and processing costs better understood as the plant has been in sustained production since last update. Resource classification in MRE5 will also see more upgrading, focused around the areas of the highest confidence in data. There will be an update in the cut-off grade calculations in MRE5 that will incorporate the revised gold price forecasts and those operating costs.

As exploration goes at Nalunaq, the framework is already there to be drilled out and bought into the resource model and mine plan, currently stands at 10 yrs mining in MRE4, but in total, the combined Exploration Target for Nalunaq is estimated to be between 600,000 and 2.3 million tonnes at 10 to 30 g/t Au, representing a potential contained gold content of approximately 195,000 to 2.3 million ounces as per MRE4.

Producers typically only give updates centering around the mine on drilling and production in their quarterly reports, with annual MRE updates necessary to understand what they need to do next geologically through the next year.

Producers essentially don’t have to worry about the effects of share dilution.

You have kept the dialogue going throughout Cp which we are all very gratefull. You do actually talk a lot of sense a lot of the time in your unique style. Which normally flies in the face of a lot of naive investors, but you have to put it out there to challenge the sometimes blinkered norm. Many just don’t appreciate how things can change in the blink of an eye to not take anything in mining for granted.

Hope and Gorob will be worth more when selling it if it's up and running, once it's up and running then IMO we will sell it outright.

There’s is a fair point made there, but if you were to weigh up how much of the project NPV would potentially still need to be given away before there is surplus income over expenditure coming in. Have no idea how much pre stripping to access the ore body, mine development and all infrastructure engineering and development is actually costing. Others may know.

But projects with a funding solution in place are worth inherently more than those without. It could somehow get taken over lock stock long before first ore goes through the plant. Personally don’t see this happening but in the world of Colin Bird, always expect the unexpected, there’s usually a twist.

Originally it was looking to be earlier in the quarter but didn’t Shaun say at some point recently it will now be in December??

Oh god yes a going home kebab, then waking up in a ditch covered in puke.

I fancy a beer now.

Many a night playing killer doozer, well…. usually every night then Saturday night clubbing and a good ole punch up. Those were the days 🙄

Combo variation of how’zat, mums maiden name as in Howe and zap which as a teenager in the 80’s

When pubs were pubs, you would write your name up on the chalk board to play pool next, winner stayed on of course. I always put zap⚡️

Mr Swann by any chance? Joined the XTr TG group last week

Archer is an experienced financial writer and freelance analyst with a masters in Law, his quite unique analysis and free appraisals for literaly any stock asked for on his TG group would probably not be found elsewhere on AIM. He puts out disclaimers like every one else.

He has strict criteria for the companies he promotes and has been very open about the fact how any PR he does is paid for, which isn’t a big part of his main income.

It would be naive to dismiss it completely as it is a very good tool for steering your own research so you can back it up. His shared analysis, research and advice has completely turned my portfolio around.

Not at all gixxer, I’m not accusing you of being bigoted based on any of your posts today and if I did I know you wouldn’t give a rats ar5e anyway. I think you actually have a real affection for him with your pet names 😂

That’s it, now hit the little fat chap where it really hurts…. His Grammar.

“One big takeaway for me. Presume you will spot it as not hard….”

Monetise O’Callahans was an interesting one.

Fortunately by the time income was coming in from Manica, the capital market route was already starting to give juniors big problems with having to offer higher dilutive discounted rates for exploration funding. But CB gets no credit for that either.

Think you are confusing xtract as a copper producer and not a junior explorer Boudica. Yes the disappointment surrounding br had an effect, but AIM was already extremely volatile with juniors in the resource sector particularly and most other stocks that did not have any form of income to support a level of MC were in free fall. At that point xtract only had a trickle coming in from the gold alluvials and mining equiptment destined for Mozambique stuck in a port.

The past ten years has unfortunately been stretched out due to the economic fallout from firstly Covid and the subsequent difficulties that have ensued. You only have to ask yourself if you believe in the copper story and company strategy to position various projects with pre/df feasibility studies in the marketplace for monetisation through whatever means being best for that particular project. If you don’t agree, like it, trust how CB runs the company or cannot wait until then. How is that CB’s fault?

The small mines stratergy to try to exploit higher metal prices sooner to provide a revenue stream and to further advance project scale up, is a really good example of how ‘this’ particular company can and has been able to move forward and be non dilutive as it has done so for the past 5 years and counting. But will still need time to get to a point where they can make a decision to mine.

cb himself is not going to allow any inability to perform his duties to the best of his ability if it was going to be at the detriment of any of those companies he runs, neither would the various boards of directors or major stakeholders to that end. whatever weight shareholders decided to put behind his over optimistic comments on br podcasts they had **** all to do with his age ben.

There is no evidence to suggest cb’s skills are being affected by age. The only noticeable difference is that he is now far more pragmatic in interviews. Now to suggest the share price tanking is due to his age hampering xtract is ridiculous and I’m not going to let you wind me up lucky as you surely must be.

Age is not a concern until it becomes a concern. You are exhibiting unacceptable bigoted behaviour. Full stop.

whatever your gripes are it’s despicable bigoted behaviour to single out cb due to his age. you are no better than ******s or sexists. keep it respectable at least