Member Info for hopsta999

I'd hardly call a 10% drop small

Won't this just mean billions more shares to dilute us further?

Whilst not defending deramping a lot of us don't have the luxury of top up options. Faced with the daily routine of 10% been wiped off your investment until news drops then this is the only way that some of us can protect capital. Believe me the small amounts that I can do would not influence the sp

I think that we can conclude that most of us ( that are not filtered now) are in this for the same thing although have slightly different views and nerves. Onwards and upwards

Cyrox.. we were told but the manner which the board doing it stinks.. Paul Ryan just dumped and shafted us. Trevor with his conflict of interest just dumped.. they both knew very well that in the short term it would destroy the rms share price yet did not give a **** .. thats why something needs putting out to settle nerves and hopefully confirming changes on the BOD

Hi Cyrox.. it is not the product that a lot of us have issues with.. its just with such a high amount of the company that has been sold we could do with a communication from the board given the recent shenanigans. Thanks

Skymonkey I appreciate that they are busy but the nomad is employed for a reason. The sale of so much of the company is fundamental and shareholders have a right to know whats going on

Everyone email the investors relations team.. from 8 emails that I have sent not one reply to a simple question of what is going on at board level. A vast percentage of the company sold and you are treating your shareholders with contempt.. its not a lot to ask of them is it. Even if nothing contractual then something to calm people. As it stands I have zero confidence in the BOD

I feel sorry for him . I think he must be angry that he has a very tiny micro pen1s and is venting his frustration towards this board

Is that all this useless board reckon we are worth these days ffs

Hey Paul mack I'm from Dudley!

I did post on brh last night and pointed out that Trevor would stab his own granny in the back and burn her if there was profit to be made

Paul and Trevor actions

await to see what the next rns says but I am not convinced that destroying the share price by mass selling of shares was in shareholders interest.

I and hundreds of small investors would love to be proven wrong 

I have copied and pasted the following :

The second major duty of a company director is to promote the success of the company. This is probably the most well-known of the 7 duties

The duty states a director must act in a way that they consider, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the bene?t of its members (shareholders) as a whole. When making decisions, directors must also consider the likely consequences for various stakeholders, including employees, suppliers, customers and communities. They should also consider the impact on the environment, the reputation of the company, company success in the longer term and all of the shareholders (including minority shareholders).

Thank you

Copied and pasted sending to investor relations

Yes davethedumplin.. so much lube been used after excessive mm shafting that the Mrs thinks I'm on the turn to the other side.

Rns codes. Absolute bull ****e... it will drop when it drops.

Can't sell on aj bell or share centre either

Wtf is going on now

Yes Tb has a face that should be on the bog roll in a dodgy curry house

Until we get a concrete update on operations or hopefully that Trevor has fecked off then this will go down. A proper board that acts within the interests of its shareholders would update them following the massive dump by the director and one of the major holders. Question though does this board and in particular Trevor have an ounce of integrity or share holder interest. I severely doubt it.