No, they just want to be paid. It isn't the same thing. If the lenders wanted to be in the claims management business then they would be a claims management company rather than a lender. They want the best and simplest route to get the best return. That may well be to support the business rather than pull the rug. We'll find out in time, but the lenders just want an appropriate return for their risk.
No-one is suggesting that the buy back was a good idea. Would have made a big difference if that whole process hadn't been done, for sure.
Not much that can be done about the buy back now there, as it was done. It is about trying to improve things from the current position rather than trying to invest a time machine to change what has already happened.
I also couldn't even buy here on my main account if I wanted to, as it is with II and they don't allow buys of Mast. HL do, so I guess (with a massive health warning alongside the button) but it is just interesting more than anything. I also don't like unfairness or duplicity, so I challenge that if I see it.
Less than £1,000 in total trades in a week. This share shouldn't be listed imo. Buy it out at a fair price someone, and put holders out of their misery.
245,200,000 new shares got admitted on 8th October. Warrants are being exercised, shares issued and shares sold, not necessarily in that order. I expect a warrant RNS in the next 48 hours.
Umaz, they have been periodically exercising. It's no good you looking for specific RNS's detailing the exercising of warrants though, as Mast normally hide them right at the bottom of fluffy RNS'S. Review most of the ones over recent months and you'll invariably find details at the bottom.
The volume of warrants to existing shares was many fold so they couldn't realistically be exercised in one day. They have been playing dropping the bait every now and then, waiting for PI's to jump onboard and then pulling the rug away from them, if you'll please excuse the jumble of metaphors.