Member Info for Hexam

“I would have thought that at the initial stage, all a potential client needs to see is the live mining pool income is higher than without the Methods.”

That can’t be how they are demonstrating it as they would need many more machines with their methods ‘attached’ than they have to have any hope of making enough of a difference to a mining pool to confirm the methods works as claimed.

KK - It makes perfect sense what I posted. I am invested because I believe the share will spike on misleading hype but I don’t believe in the company. If I did believe then I wouldn’t bash it as that indeed would not be logical. Equally if I believed anything I said affected the sp I wouldn’t post negatively as that would be shooting myself in the foot so would also not be logical.

As it is I am simply being honest with my views on QBT rather than ramp it insincerely simply because I’m invested. Now that would be sign of no moral standards!

Btw you’re and you are mean exactly the same thing obviously - so very puzzled by your post to Phimx. Are you down the pub again by any chance?

“Wonder where the share price would be without the bashers bashing on this board?”

Exactly where it is now Jambone.

Keep the dim comments coming PAS 😃

For the millionth time (ok, that’s a QBT kind of exaggeration) I don’t believe in the company (hence the negative comments) but I do believe there are enough idiots that believe whatever FG says to spike the sp the next time he teases some ‘progress’.

So whilst the likes of you, KK and Dooogle (aka Jambone) keep posting it gives me confidence the ride hasn’t ended yet and there are still enough people out there willing to believe in the hype and suck others into the delusion.

So please, ramp away!

“QBT were at mining disrupt and there is zero evidence to say they haven’t demonstrated to potential clients backed up with irrefutable results.”

Yes, and there is also zero evidence that they have or that any results are ‘irrefutable’.

...or the vitriolic positive rubbish yet either.

Jamboogle, what are you on about. Reading too much into things as usual.

There was no itinerary demonstrating any method - just their intention to do so and no evidence at all so far that they have.

According to QBT it COULD be possible to demo Method B in the near future - so your translation of that into '"will shortly be able to be demonstrated also" is highly misleading.

"Jose and Ronald, both very high profile in intel and now fully behind QBT and its methods, why are they so happy to endorse?" It's just a group photo including two people who used to work for/with Intel.

The proof of the pudding will be in any published outcome of any 'meetings'.

No doubt the messages saying that we'll hear something soon will change to 'well, we haven't heard something yet because deals take time to set up and NDAs are probably in place' then to 'well, it looks like they are doing live demos in Vegas so our time is now'. In other words a repeat of the Nashville damp squib with hopes moving instead onto the next conference. Then repeat again. And again...

No Bruce, it wasn’t - it needed 75%. As RNS says clearly “the resolution was not passed”.

Then can choose whatever ticker they like I would have thought (so long as it isn’t taken) - doesn’t have to relate to company name at all.

“Voted against but they are going ahead with it anyway!”

I don’t think they are. From what I understand they have rebranded as Debs but the vote was about changing the actual company name - which has failed and is not going ahead.

“Mrhanji didn’t everyone go on about the halving last year how we were primed to benefit?”

Yes, this is about the 76th time they’ve supposedly been in the ‘right place right time’ only for it to turn out that they were in the wrong place after all - and it may not have been the right time anyway.

Maybe 77th time lucky 🤞

“so their 2024 results might end up back to profit.”

Absolutely zero chance of that I’m afraid.

It’s actually £11.7m at 3.4p plus £3m at 2.55p plus a possible further £10m at some future sp plus possible loan conversions at 25% discount to some future sp.

However you look at it though it is a stinking amount of dilution but at least they get to fight another day (yet again) - assuming it goes ahead.

“Childish board. Bunch of c0ck swingers.”

Yep, that’s childish. Well done on proving your own point :-)

KK - calm down, you’re all over the place.

Yes, they have just done a raise which is exactly WHY I’ve invested again, as I said that I would as I said that was the trigger for me to reinvest when I sold last time. The raise, as expected, sent the price tumbling and so I’ve bought back cheaply ready for the next spike. That will hopefully be long before the next raise which I think is many months away.

And yes, of course I was happy to sell as I made a profit. So were you weren’t you? I’ve bought back in - and again so have you so not sure what you’re getting at?

You’re now saying I’m not mentally deranged/damaged but just stupid - which is actually something completely different so why did you say deranged/damaged? Caught out again and rowing back once more? And if I’m so ‘stupid’ why do I keep being so right about QBT (the raise, no revenue in 2024 etc)?

“No one in their right mind would buy into a company, then bash it every single day. Tell me I'm wrong.....”

OK - you’re wrong. Btw I don’t bash it every single day. Far from it. So doubly wrong.

“Email QBT with your questions”. Why? They are not the ones claiming the ‘facts’ that you state (clients wanting to pay for their services now).

You seem to have exactly the same approach to me with QBT, buy at the dips and sell on the spikes - what does it matter if I believe in the long term success of QBT or not? What either of us says won’t make any difference and we’ll both end up profiting again (or not) regardless. So why do you get so emotional and abusive?

“Funny thing is we were all saying this last year, and the year before.... Looks like they're kitchen sinking it....”

Yes, kitchen sinks are another thing they seem to be overstocked on - no doubt we’ll get an impairment for these as well pretty soon :-)

KK - so I’m ‘seriously mentally damaged’ now? Goodness me you’re an unpleasant fellow.

And you still haven’t answered the question. Yes, I know that they have said they are in a position to demonstrate Method A and C and INTEND to do so this week - and perhaps will also be in position to demonstrate Method B soon. Let’s see if any of that actually happens but that wasn’t the question.

You claimed it was a ‘FACT’ that clients wanted to pay for the services QBT have to offer - even before any such demonstrations and them having a service ready to sell. Are you now admitting you were wrong and are rowing back on your claim?

KK - can you actually answer the question rather than obsess over my mental health and quality of life in that nasty way of yours?

What service is it that QBT have ready to sell? Method B is not ready to demonstrate yet (source QBT) and Method C needs to developed with a chip manufacturer before it can be sold to anybody (again source QBT). As for Method A even if that was ready to sell (which it isn’t) it gives no more improvement than many are achieving themselves already.

You can’t answer so instead hide behind not ‘helping a troll’ and your usual abuse. It is you that can’t back up what you say. I can, and do - as I did for example in giving the reasons, based on their published accounts, as to why they would need to do a raise before April - which they duly did.

And as I’ve said many times I don’t believe in QBT based on their failure to date in delivering anything tangible and their weak excuses for not doing so, instead moving the goalposts continuously.

However I am invested because the sp regularly spikes as they seem adept at getting punters excited, especially before a raise, so I’m just taking advantage of that (as indeed you said you did)! So what’s so hard to understand?

“The potential customers are coming to QBT. They are wanting to pay QBT for a service they want - this is a fact.”

No, it is NOT a fact. We don’t know if they will meet with anybody and certainly not whether any they do meet with want to pay QBT for a service - that’s rather pre-empting any outcome isn’t it? Besides, surely they need to partner with someone first to help develop the chip before they have something to sell to potential clients i.e. exactly what they said themselves.

When did they go back to selling something directly to clients - and what exactly is it?

I’ve explained many times, in simple terms, why I am negative on QBT and why, despite that, I am invested. So what’s odd is that you just don’t seem to get it and instead keep making the same point over and over again.

Not only that but you keep suggesting people who don’t behave as you expect have some kind of mental illness and need professional help. That also seems odd and not very nice either but then again you really don’t seem to be a very nice person - but whatever makes you feel better.

“Everybody knows the Presentation will be from 25th to 27th March.”

Do they? Not even FG knew that as he only said they ‘intend’ to give demonstrations - just like they intended at Nashville to give them.

So we can only wait for any confirmation (again) that they did indeed give them only this time we hopefully won’t be disappointed - otherwise it’s on to the next conference and repeat.