Member Info for Hepran

NU/Zag, thinking about it though their main worry is dilution and a some who also have a high average.

But is there any other alternative out there that would not require the issuing of more shares.

Do the TG group have some financiers ready to put in the cash without demanding for shares in liu

“I call it deception !” wow exactly the kind of post the bod warned against.

A screen shot taken in case they need it.

This is a serious allegation and I hope they take this kind of comment further.

The board is working hard and doing everything possible to bring this back to trading and this is what you accuse them of?

I can see the no voters running are panicking, running scared.

Why don’t you lot stick to your alternative plan, keep it among yourselves in the TG group and stop infesting this bb with nonsense.

“The no’s have it , the no’s have it …… again 😉”

HTH stop posting lies and misinformation or you would be reported.

Nobody knows the results of the votes yet, not even the bod, because not everyone has voted which is on the 23rd of December.

Nobody should listen to the trolls from the TG group.

There aren’t any alternative deals, they are just come on here to cause confusion and doubt.

Why the secrecy, just another load of nonsense they have been at for the past 15 months.

If there were, why is it taking so long and why after the GM?

A group of fantasists who believe in their own deception.

Either that or can’t do simple arithmetics.

Full of over egged egos in that group.

Couldn’t stand the place.

“They have done nothing positive in all this time” absolutely right NU.

“People Talk about a return to trading this is it! Clear transparency on dillution with an imminent return to trading”

Hahaha okay I will vote no then

Don’t be silly gasman, why are you trying to trick people into voting no.

Steve why hasn’t this so called shareholders group engaged all this while?

Is everyone who has bought shares in this company not a shareholder?

Zag, stop wasting your time with these no voters, they have nothing to offer.

Townman,

“Yes, please let personal insults be kept to a minimum”

You should be directing this at HTH not me, I haven’t seen you do this!

I’m not surprised at your no voting, I have voted yes so don’t have a go because our opinions remain divided

“I have been suckered. I took a PPP risk I may afford to lose but it was not to the extent of the currently anticipated Ukraine investment”

lol, why are you struggling to see that so far it remains far better than the Texas dud we were sold as a lie which has expired leases with no hope of renewal, open your eyes.

And I would appreciate if you stop lecturing me thanks

Townman

You are busy talking about true or untrue rumours and deflected from the basics at hand.

You still haven’t explained my previous question.

“ i just don't think upbringing should be questioned”

The statement is very common across the bulletin boards on LSE whenever someone constitutes themselves to be a nuisance by trying to cause deliberate distruptions, fud etc it’s nothing new

why don’t you lecture the like of HTH who sprouts nothing but personal insults whenever he posts on here.

I will post as I feel fit as long as it’s within the LSE rules.

“ Have though wondered about how proud parents of PPP directorate must be, particularly regarding Jesse White's purchased shares”.

Even those of the ex ceo who suckered all of us into this with lies and deception!

Townman

“What is the talk about upbringing about? Really? It has been rumoured that you are a gentleman of a religious background. If so, please do unto others”

Wow I must have gotten you folks in the TG group rattled for me to be the topic of discussion!!

How do you mean religious background…please explain, I’d like to know?

And what has religion got to do with this anyhow, nobody in their right mind will sit back and let some brainwashed folks mess up their investment.

And as for those who have bet their houses on this what a very foolish thing to do.

The rule states to invest only what you can afford to lose.

They will have themselves to blame if this never comes back especially for being an obstacle to every effort to make progress here.

Affrm,

There can’t be that many no votes as you claim, the last resolution was 46% to 54% against Lunn which is pretty close, I suspect the gap would have closed significantly since then now that the bod are releasing more details.

about deals etc.

All resolutions needs to be passed for us to move this forward.

He had a wrong up bring that’s why.

Nothing constructive ever comes out of his mouth except insults and being rude.

That’s a strange one, that it was Deja vu for a sec, I knew I had read that post before lol

Delta not at all and I appreciate you balanced posts but sometimes your veer towards the left and suits the agenda of the no voters

The bottom line is nobody knows including yourself what the amount of dilution will be

Sometimes the messenger carries the wrong message….

Delta,

Hepran, after the RTO I agree the marcap will be a lot higher, but if you objectively look at what PPP has today and companies in similar positions it's CURRENT market value is clearly a lot lower than in July 2024.

The bod are doing soo much to add value so you can’t say for sure that the current value will be a lot lower than 2024, that’s a misleading statement because it’s not factual.

“ If someone, regardless of side, posts something that isn't accurate then sometimes I correct it.”

Hmm that sounds big headed, what makes you think your correction is bona fide?

Delta

“Hepran, after the RTO I agree the marcap will be a lot higher, but if you objectively look at what PPP has today and companies in similar positions it's CURRENT market value is clearly a lot lower than in July 2024”