Member Info for Helpful

In the RNSs and in the interviews Boring Boy. Literally, RRR stated in the RNS

"In the Ivory Coast, the Company assessed three serious approaches for purchase or partnership of part or all of its tenement package The Company yesterday received a AUD60,000 exclusivity fee giving a proposed acquirer of Ivory Coast assets a 30 day exclusivity."

Do you understand what the word "multiple" means?

zzzz

Again, the village attention-seeker just making stuff up.

We know that RRR has had multiple approaches over BF, CDI, Australia and Kenya. It takes two to do a deal. As usual you just make prejudiced assumptions and then proceed as though they were facts.

RRR has recently confirmed it has entered into an exclusivity agreement with one party on CDI and had three wanting to do a deal.

In my view, (note this opinion and not a fact) Boulon is the current best asset. That will likely change once we have done the deal on the JV.

DYOR

Given that Soma hadn't as of yesterday confirmed the end of the strike and/or that El Limon had restarted production, AB and RRR did the right thing.

zzzzz

DYOR

$3,975 earlier

DYOR

$3,955

Looks like it might be heading to $4,000.

DYOR

Usual nonsense.

Comes out with drivel on CDI and promptly tries to move on to something else.

zzzzz

Still no confirmation that they have ended the strike at Operadora and/or restarted production at El Limon.

RRR's deal is looking better by the day.

DYOR

And here we have the crux of it: "believability".

So when RRR puts out something in an RRR Reach, you don't believe it because you claim it is not a "real RNS" but when RRR puts out something in an RNS, you claim that is not believable. I take you do realise that the NOMAD has oversight of both the RNSs and RNS Reach? That he will not allow RRR to publish either an RNS or an RNS Reach that is not true? So positive statements have to be verified?

So the statement about having three parties which wanted to transact has to be verified! The statement about receipt of funds has to be verified! The statement about the extension of the exclusivity and multiple exclusivity fees has to be verified! That the exclusivity to the middle of October has to be verified! And so on.

You have made multiple false statements on here and continue to do so.

You need help Boring Boy.

zzzzz

DYOR

Conjecture, otherwise known as "I don't know anything but let me make something up so I look I am important and can be the centre of attention".

CDI is hot, as is gold. We know that RRR has had at least two exclusivity payments. We know that at least three parties wanted to transact.

The potential sale of certain gold assets in Ivory Coast, in respect of which the Company received exclusivity payments, is finalising documentation and assuming the parties remain ad idem as to indicative terms would be ready for execution shortly. Given the rise in the gold price, the Company would in any case be unlikely to extend exclusivity beyond mid-October."

What the company is saying is that it wanted a prompt transaction and that the movement in the gold price meant that better terms would be available elsewhere.

"In the Ivory Coast, the Company assessed three serious approaches for purchase or partnership of part or all of its tenement package The Company yesterday received a AUD60,000 exclusivity fee giving a proposed acquirer of Ivory Coast assets a 30 day exclusivity"

The gold price today is $3,934. The price when the exclusivity fee was received was $3,377. That is a material change. Presumably negotiations took a while given that two other parties were in with a shout and so the price would have been lower still when negotiations started.

Why would you extend with a party that has not moved to a binding agreement in ten weeks?

What you try to present as problems are just commercial matters.

PS as you don't understand these things, we keep the exclusivity fees.

zzzzzz

DYOR

I take It you are drinking again?

Https://x.com/KoboResources/status/1975161616036442235?t=MVNIItiMYU52EgWPVvIl3g&s=19

DYOR

Https://www.marketindex.com.au/news/gold-prices-are-surging-and-miners-might-still-be-cheap

DYOR

$3,948

Wonderful

DYOR

Https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-26/copper-set-for-biggest-weekly-gain-since-april-on-supply-outages

DYOR

If this happens stand well back.

https://www.reuters.com/markets/wealth/morgan-stanley-cio-favors-602020-portfolio-strategy-with-gold-inflation-hedge-2025-09-16/?s=09

DYOR

So gold got to $3,890 and stopped.

$3,900 this week coming?

🤞

Nothing happening in CDI because Boring Boy says so...

https://www.mining.com/web/ivory-coast-grants-11-new-mining-permits-to-boost-exploration/

DYOR

Been doing stuff you no-life trolls. If I told you, it would only provoke more childish tantrums of the 12 years old school playground types. Best that I keep you in suspense.

Anyway, gold..... Looks like gold might pop its nose over $3,900 before the close. Copper $10,490.50 on LME.

DYOR

Maidit, one has to protect one's investment but it is also good to get them to make stupid statements with which we can belabour them.

You know the usual ones: Musonoi is worthless, Glencore are not interested, Soma won't pay a penny, RRR has lost the CDI licences, the CDI licences are worthless, no one is interested in CDI, there is no DRC JV..... and so on.

Boring Boy tries to wrap it up in so much drivel that he can claim he was right regardless.

DYOR

Https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChart.html?sharechart=RRR&share=Red-Rock-Resources