Member Info for HeimlichIII

Those guys have as much of a case as you do. Can’t criticise people for being half full’ers.

Totally agree. Some kind of update on how it’s going would be very nice. Not necessarily an RNS, just a twitter post or similar. ‘Meetings continuing and we are progressing towards completion’ or something like that, just to reassure us (very patient) investors that we’re on a good trajectory

I think the sigh is more in frustration of not being there yet and having to answer the same questions. Questions that PI’s definitely need to be asking mind you. Naheed has significant skin in the game at a much higher average so I am sure she will be doing all she can as quick as she can.

Would love an update on the feasibility timescale though…

18% spread certainly not helping in livening up the market

Agreed. Having recently told us the engagement via that platform would improve.

Yeah. Great to see legal has a more realistic target now 👍

Any number of possible reasons you may have had to sell and now can’t buy back.

Anyway, I’m not having a go, I’m just explaining (as many have) that something doesn’t add up as nobody in right mind would go on a BB to knock a company that they are not invested in and have no intention of investing in. For that reason this is about ORCP.

It’s frustrating, but maybe that’s what you’re pitching for.

Legal - It’s just a little odd posting so frequently on a BB for a share you claim not to be invested in or to have any desire to invest in.

I’m putting you in the, “invested in the past, lost money and now don’t want others to have success you would miss out on”, category.

The only other possible explanation is that you are in fact invested but you’ve decided that you want to play this role here.

Ok, interesting.

Re name calling comment, you called me an ‘amateur’ earlier designed as an insult when I had done no such name calling to you.

I guess that was a sign of defeat.

Legal - genuine question so please answer sensibly.

As not invested, are you here because:

a) You are trying to warn people away from the share

b) You believe this will be an investment at some stage so are watching and waiting until it is

I can’t see any other possible agenda but please correct me if I’m wrong.

And clearly the lottery is an extreme example before you predictably start suggesting I’m calling ORCP a lottery.

Legal - the reason that people like you act so smug but come across as an idiot is because you act like everything is 50/50 when actually it’s all about expected return.

Would you walk up to somebody buying a lotto ticket, tell them they’re not going to win, then go back and smuggly tell them you told them so?

Simple maths for you. Calculate expected return by taking the probability of each possible outcome and multiplying it by the expected return in that case. This will give you an idea of the risk associated with the investment. Of course, the probabilities and returns are open to the interpretation of the shareholder, but please stop acting like it’s the flip of a coin.

The expected return here is high thanks to the extreme upside should any / multiple projects come to fruition. That fact more than any is what makes sitting through dilution worth it for the investors (which I seem to recall you are not).

If you are not willing to do your own maths, pease just go and hangout outside Martins and tell lottery ticket buyers they’re not going to win, you’ll enjoy that.

I didn’t say financing and investment happing very soon. You are struggling with basic sentence structure. I said, “things happening very soon”, I assume feasibility study, drilling, solar developments etc…then, in the next part of the complex sentence I pointed out that she’s also talked about financing and investment possibilities. I know we are not there yet. Who knows when. I am expecting further dilution at some stage, that’s how development projects like this work.

The reason I am not quoting directly is because I do not have the time to listen through again and pick out direct quotes. As you say, the PI folk can make their own judgements.

Are you suggesting busting a gut and looking exhausted are not related?? One kind of leads to the other.

She regularly talked about things happening very soon, financing and investment possibilities and a return for shareholders.

Anyway, not posted here for a while, not getting involved in such a comical exchange with somebody who thinks busting a gut would make you look fresh and ready to go. Wally.

Are you sure you listened to the right thing?

Sometimes you talk ‘some’ sense, but on this occasion I couldn't disagree more.

I got the impression she is busting a gut to get some SP impacting news to the market very soon.

Because the revenue comes in bucket loads later. They need to be paid to develop the projects. 🤷🏼‍♂️

Your use of uppercase is annoying. And the word Roman.

Very, very +ve is also a bit strong.

Other than that, and that you completely let yourself down by your overexcitement, I hope you’re right.

That’s incorrect. Evenly spread its circa £26m each

*sane...they probably are all the same one too mind you

Guys, I’m all for GDR but the first you hear of FDA won’t be via a check box on Beckman website. You’re in danger of allowing the derampers sound like the same ones.